Re: [PATCH v2] of: Specify initrd location using 64-bit

[Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>]

On Saturday 20 July 2013 01:39 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Jul 2013 16:34:26 -0500, Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 07/01/2013 01:20 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>>> On some PAE architectures, the entire range of physical memory could reside
>>> outside the 32-bit limit.  These systems need the ability to specify the
>>> initrd location using 64-bit numbers.
>>>
>>> This patch globally modifies the early_init_dt_setup_initrd_arch() function to
>>> use 64-bit numbers instead of the current unsigned long.
>>>
>>> There has been quite a bit of debate about whether to use u64 or phys_addr_t.
>>> It was concluded to stick to u64 to be consistent with rest of the device
>>> tree code. As summarized by Geert, "The address to load the initrd is decided
>>> by the bootloader/user and set at that point later in time. The dtb should not
>>> be tied to the kernel you are booting"
>>
>> That was quoting me. Otherwise:
>>
>> Acked-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
>>
>> Unless Grant feels compelled to pick this up for 3.11, I think it has to
>> wait for 3.12.
> 
> Nope, 3.12 is fine. Applied.
> 
Thanks Grant.

Regards,
Santosh