From: Vasant Hegde <hegdevasant@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Use ibm, chip-id property to compute cpu_core_mask if available
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 12:52:12 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <520498A4.9050805@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130704030506.GA2396@iris.ozlabs.ibm.com>
On 07/04/2013 08:35 AM, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Some systems have an ibm,chip-id property in the cpu nodes in the
> device tree. On these systems, we now use that to compute the
> cpu_core_mask (i.e. the set of core siblings) rather than looking
> at cache properties.
>
Paul,
I wanted to test this patch but not able to apply this patch on top of Linux
tree. Looks like I'm missing traverse_core_siblings() related patch. I searched
in ppc mailing list and couldn't figure out.
Can you point me to related patch?
-Vasant
> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
> ---
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> index b72d8c9..3b7a118 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -587,6 +587,32 @@ int cpu_first_thread_of_core(int core)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpu_first_thread_of_core);
>
> +static void traverse_siblings_chip_id(int cpu, int add, int chipid)
> +{
> + const struct cpumask *mask;
> + struct device_node *np;
> + int i, plen;
> + const int *prop;
> +
> + mask = add ? cpu_online_mask : cpu_present_mask;
> + for_each_cpu(i, mask) {
> + np = of_get_cpu_node(i, NULL);
> + if (!np)
> + continue;
> + prop = of_get_property(np, "ibm,chip-id", &plen);
> + if (prop && plen == sizeof(int) && *prop == chipid) {
> + if (add) {
> + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpu_core_mask(i));
> + cpumask_set_cpu(i, cpu_core_mask(cpu));
> + } else {
> + cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, cpu_core_mask(i));
> + cpumask_clear_cpu(i, cpu_core_mask(cpu));
> + }
> + }
> + of_node_put(np);
> + }
> +}
> +
> /* Must be called when no change can occur to cpu_present_mask,
> * i.e. during cpu online or offline.
> */
> @@ -611,14 +637,29 @@ static struct device_node *cpu_to_l2cache(int cpu)
>
> static void traverse_core_siblings(int cpu, int add)
> {
> - struct device_node *l2_cache;
> + struct device_node *l2_cache, *np;
> const struct cpumask *mask;
> - int i;
> + int i, chip, plen;
> + const int *prop;
> +
> + /* First see if we have ibm,chip-id properties in cpu nodes */
> + np = of_get_cpu_node(cpu, NULL);
> + if (np) {
> + chip = -1;
> + prop = of_get_property(np, "ibm,chip-id", &plen);
> + if (prop && plen == sizeof(int))
> + chip = *(int *)prop;
> + of_node_put(np);
> + if (chip >= 0) {
> + traverse_siblings_chip_id(cpu, add, chip);
> + return;
> + }
> + }
>
> l2_cache = cpu_to_l2cache(cpu);
> mask = add ? cpu_online_mask : cpu_present_mask;
> for_each_cpu(i, mask) {
> - struct device_node *np = cpu_to_l2cache(i);
> + np = cpu_to_l2cache(i);
> if (!np)
> continue;
> if (np == l2_cache) {
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-09 7:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-04 3:05 [PATCH] powerpc: Use ibm,chip-id property to compute cpu_core_mask if available Paul Mackerras
2013-08-09 7:22 ` Vasant Hegde [this message]
2013-08-10 3:44 ` Paul Mackerras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=520498A4.9050805@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=hegdevasant@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).