From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e23smtp09.au.ibm.com (e23smtp09.au.ibm.com [202.81.31.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e23smtp09.au.ibm.com", Issuer "GeoTrust SSL CA" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B29412C00E0 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 07:25:37 +1000 (EST) Received: from /spool/local by e23smtp09.au.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 18:20:14 +1000 Received: from d23relay05.au.ibm.com (d23relay05.au.ibm.com [9.190.235.152]) by d23dlp03.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6F35357804E for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 07:25:34 +1000 (EST) Received: from d23av03.au.ibm.com (d23av03.au.ibm.com [9.190.234.97]) by d23relay05.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id r7CL9cNV6357410 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 07:09:38 +1000 Received: from d23av03.au.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d23av03.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id r7CLPYQh027369 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 07:25:34 +1000 Message-ID: <520952C9.3060101@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 16:25:29 -0500 From: Nathan Fontenot MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Register bootmem pages at boot on powerpc References: <52050ACE.4090001@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <52050B80.8010602@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1376266763.32100.144.camel@pasglop> <5208DCBC.7060205@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1376341985.32100.174.camel@pasglop> In-Reply-To: <1376341985.32100.174.camel@pasglop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: linux-mm , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 08/12/2013 04:13 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Mon, 2013-08-12 at 08:01 -0500, Nathan Fontenot wrote: >>> Can you tell me a bit more, the above makes me nervous... >> >> Ok, I agree. that message isn't quite right. >> >> What I wanted to convey is that memory hotplug is not fully supported >> on powerpc with SPARSE_VMEMMAP enabled.. Perhaps the message should read >> "Memory hotplug is not fully supported for bootmem info nodes". >> >> Thoughts? > > Since SPARSE_VMEMMAP is our default and enabled in our distros, that mean > that memory hotplug isn't fully supported for us in general ? Actually... We have had the distros (at least SLES 11 and RHEL 6 releases) disable SPARSE_VMEMMAP in their releases. > > What do you mean by "not fully supported" ? What precisely is missing ? > What will happen if one tries to plug or unplug memory? I don't know everything that is missing, but there are several routines that need to be defined for power to support memory hotplug with SPARSE_VMEMMAP. > > Shouldn't we fix it ? Working on it, but it's not there yet. > > Cheers, > Ben. > >