From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Michael Neuling To: David Rientjes Subject: Re: linux-next: PowerPC boot failures in next-20120521 In-reply-to: References: <20120522114051.0c9db9a7c2d660bc9e0e1be2@canb.auug.org.au> <328.1337652722@neuling.org> <2182.1337654352@neuling.org> <2246.1337654423@neuling.org> <3120.1337655100@neuling.org> Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 13:12:15 +1000 Message-ID: <5214.1337656335@neuling.org> Cc: Lee Schermerhorn , Stephen Rothwell , Peter Zijlstra , Linus , LKML , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , ppc-dev , Ingo Molnar List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , David Rientjes wrote: > On Tue, 22 May 2012, Michael Neuling wrote: > > > Sorry, got it... CONFIG_DEBUG_VM enabled below... > > > > pid_max: default: 32768 minimum: 301 > > Dentry cache hash table entries: 262144 (order: 5, 2097152 bytes) > > Inode-cache hash table entries: 131072 (order: 4, 1048576 bytes) > > Mount-cache hash table entries: 4096 > > Initializing cgroup subsys cpuacct > > Initializing cgroup subsys devices > > Initializing cgroup subsys freezer > > POWER7 performance monitor hardware support registered > > ------------[ cut here ]------------ > > kernel BUG at /scratch/mikey/src/linux-next/include/linux/gfp.h:318! > > Yeah, this is what I was expecting, it's tripping on > > VM_BUG_ON(nid < 0 || nid >= MAX_NUMNODES || !node_online(nid)); > > and slub won't pass nid < 0. You're sure my patch is applied? :) I did have your patch applied but at "b4cdf91 sched/numa: Implement numa balancer" (where git bisect spotted the fail). If I apply your patch on the full next-20120521 it does fix the problem. Sorry for the confusion. Thanks! Mikey