From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e28smtp02.in.ibm.com (e28smtp02.in.ibm.com [122.248.162.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e28smtp02.in.ibm.com", Issuer "GeoTrust SSL CA" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A1192C00BE for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 16:41:56 +1000 (EST) Received: from /spool/local by e28smtp02.in.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 12:01:43 +0530 Received: from d28relay02.in.ibm.com (d28relay02.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.59]) by d28dlp02.in.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3B4E394005C for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 12:11:38 +0530 (IST) Received: from d28av02.in.ibm.com (d28av02.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.64]) by d28relay02.in.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id r7M6hMi129622308 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 12:13:22 +0530 Received: from d28av02.in.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d28av02.in.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id r7M6fkw4031153 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 12:11:47 +0530 Message-ID: <5215B288.7040609@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 12:11:12 +0530 From: Deepthi Dharwar MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V3 3/5] powerpc/cpuidle: Generic powerpc backend cpuidle driver. References: <20130819042736.8609.17890.stgit@deepthi.in.ibm.com> <20130819042818.8609.77060.stgit@deepthi.in.ibm.com> <5211F0E0.7080507@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1376936241.31636.352.camel@snotra.buserror.net> <521447E7.5000302@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1377115703.5029.14.camel@snotra.buserror.net> <5215A69F.4090904@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1377151097.25016.287.camel@pasglop> In-Reply-To: <1377151097.25016.287.camel@pasglop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Wood Scott-B07421 , Wang Dongsheng-B40534 , "daniel.lezcano@linaro.org" , Scott Wood , "preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com" , "linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org" , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 08/22/2013 11:28 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 11:20 +0530, Deepthi Dharwar wrote: >> But if having cpuidle backend-driver separately for other powerpc arcs >> makes sense such that each one have their own state information etc >> then it makes sense to name the files as cpuidle-power.c, >> cpuilde-ppc32.c and so on. > > If by "power" you mean IBM POWER machines/CPUs, then make it > cpuidle-ibm-power or cpuidle-book3s64 maybe to clarify what families it > affects. Sure. Thanks :) Regards, Deepthi > Cheers > Ben. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Linuxppc-dev mailing list > Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org > https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev > >