From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from nommos.sslcatacombnetworking.com (nommos.sslcatacombnetworking.com [67.18.224.114]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88A846899F for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2006 02:00:54 +1100 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20060104110440.13a4dc16.nathael.pajani@cpe.fr> References: <20060104110440.13a4dc16.nathael.pajani@cpe.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <521677D9-902C-4474-AF52-5474E7C35B05@kernel.crashing.org> From: Kumar Gala Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 09:00:46 -0600 To: Nathael Pajani Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: question about arch_initcall() List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Its like any other init call. As for order look at include/linux/init.h core_initcall() first and late_initcall() last. There is no guarntee of the order in which functions are called =20 inside one group. - kumar On Jan 4, 2006, at 4:04 AM, Nathael Pajani wrote: > Hi all > > I would like to know how this macro is used, and when is called the =20= > function registered with it. > > thanks for all. > > > ---- > Nathael PAJANI > Ing=E9nieur CPE Lyon > nathael.pajani@cpe.fr > _______________________________________________ > Linuxppc-embedded mailing list > Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org > https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded