linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>
To: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Jiri Kosina <trivial@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Wang YanQing <udknight@gmail.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 15/25] smp, ppc: kill SMP single function call interrupt
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 22:04:35 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5231C9F3.4060208@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5230CC84.1010503@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On 09/12/2013 04:03 AM, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> On 09/11/2013 09:37 PM, Jiang Liu wrote:
>> From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
>>
>> Commit 9a46ad6d6df3b54 "smp: make smp_call_function_many() use logic
>> similar to smp_call_function_single()" has unified the way to handle
>> single and multiple cross-CPU function calls. Now only one interrupt
>> is needed for architecture specific code to support generic SMP function
>> call interfaces, so kill the redundant single function call interrupt.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
>> Cc: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>
>> ---
> 
> It turns out that freeing up the IPI slot in powerpc is very useful, since
> we actually wanted a slot for some other use-case (and there are only 4 slots
> available on powerpc).
> 
> Here are the patches which achieve that:
> http://marc.info/?l=linuxppc-embedded&m=137886807502898&w=2
> http://marc.info/?l=linuxppc-embedded&m=137886811502909&w=2
Hi Srivatsa,
	That's great and I will drop this patch from my series.
Could you please to kill call_function_single_action() instead of
call_function_action()? Please refer to
http://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/11/579
Regards!
Gerry

> 
> So, can you kindly consider dropping the powerpc patch from your series,
> if that is OK with you? Thanks!
> 
> BTW, after doing the powerpc cleanup, even I had thought about killing one
> of the smp-function variants in various architectures, but never got around
> to do it. But now that you have posted the series which does that, I'll try
> to review them.
> 
> Thank you!
> 
> Regards,
> Srivatsa S. Bhat
> 
>>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/smp.h |  3 +--
>>  arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c      | 12 +-----------
>>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/smp.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/smp.h
>> index 48cfc85..53faa03 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/smp.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/smp.h
>> @@ -119,8 +119,7 @@ extern int cpu_to_core_id(int cpu);
>>   * in /proc/interrupts will be wrong!!! --Troy */
>>  #define PPC_MSG_CALL_FUNCTION   0
>>  #define PPC_MSG_RESCHEDULE      1
>> -#define PPC_MSG_CALL_FUNC_SINGLE	2
>> -#define PPC_MSG_DEBUGGER_BREAK  3
>> +#define PPC_MSG_DEBUGGER_BREAK  2
>>
>>  /* for irq controllers that have dedicated ipis per message (4) */
>>  extern int smp_request_message_ipi(int virq, int message);
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
>> index 38b0ba6..0c53b10 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
>> @@ -123,12 +123,6 @@ static irqreturn_t reschedule_action(int irq, void *data)
>>  	return IRQ_HANDLED;
>>  }
>>
>> -static irqreturn_t call_function_single_action(int irq, void *data)
>> -{
>> -	generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt();
>> -	return IRQ_HANDLED;
>> -}
>> -
>>  static irqreturn_t debug_ipi_action(int irq, void *data)
>>  {
>>  	if (crash_ipi_function_ptr) {
>> @@ -146,14 +140,12 @@ static irqreturn_t debug_ipi_action(int irq, void *data)
>>  static irq_handler_t smp_ipi_action[] = {
>>  	[PPC_MSG_CALL_FUNCTION] =  call_function_action,
>>  	[PPC_MSG_RESCHEDULE] = reschedule_action,
>> -	[PPC_MSG_CALL_FUNC_SINGLE] = call_function_single_action,
>>  	[PPC_MSG_DEBUGGER_BREAK] = debug_ipi_action,
>>  };
>>
>>  const char *smp_ipi_name[] = {
>>  	[PPC_MSG_CALL_FUNCTION] =  "ipi call function",
>>  	[PPC_MSG_RESCHEDULE] = "ipi reschedule",
>> -	[PPC_MSG_CALL_FUNC_SINGLE] = "ipi call function single",
>>  	[PPC_MSG_DEBUGGER_BREAK] = "ipi debugger",
>>  };
>>
>> @@ -225,8 +217,6 @@ irqreturn_t smp_ipi_demux(void)
>>  			generic_smp_call_function_interrupt();
>>  		if (all & (1 << (24 - 8 * PPC_MSG_RESCHEDULE)))
>>  			scheduler_ipi();
>> -		if (all & (1 << (24 - 8 * PPC_MSG_CALL_FUNC_SINGLE)))
>> -			generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt();
>>  		if (all & (1 << (24 - 8 * PPC_MSG_DEBUGGER_BREAK)))
>>  			debug_ipi_action(0, NULL);
>>  #else
>> @@ -257,7 +247,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(smp_send_reschedule);
>>
>>  void arch_send_call_function_single_ipi(int cpu)
>>  {
>> -	do_message_pass(cpu, PPC_MSG_CALL_FUNC_SINGLE);
>> +	do_message_pass(cpu, PPC_MSG_CALL_FUNCTION);
>>  }
>>
>>  void arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask(const struct cpumask *mask)
>>
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2013-09-12 14:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1378915649-16395-1-git-send-email-liuj97@gmail.com>
2013-09-11 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 15/25] smp, ppc: kill SMP single function call interrupt Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 20:03   ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-09-12 14:04     ` Jiang Liu [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5231C9F3.4060208@gmail.com \
    --to=liuj97@gmail.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=jiang.liu@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=shli@kernel.org \
    --cc=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=trivial@kernel.org \
    --cc=udknight@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).