From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from intranet.asianux.com (intranet.asianux.com [58.214.24.6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C3102C0087 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 20:41:06 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <52440F00.702@asianux.com> Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 18:40:00 +0800 From: Chen Gang MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sound/soc/fsl/fsl_ssi.c: let check zero instead of check NO_IRQ References: <523FB47C.8010800@asianux.com> <523FB6F4.60803@asianux.com> <523FB735.2060906@asianux.com> <20130926102914.GG19304@sirena.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20130926102914.GG19304@sirena.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Takashi Iwai , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , lgirdwood@gmail.com, perex@perex.cz List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 09/26/2013 06:29 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:36:21AM +0800, Chen Gang wrote: >> NO_IRQ may be defined as '(unsigned int) -1' in some architectures >> (arm, sh ...), and either may not be defined in some architectures >> which can enable SND_SOC_FSL_SSI (e.g. allmodconfig for arc). > > Applied, thanks. > Thank you too. :-) -- Chen Gang