From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from db9outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (mail-db9lp0250.outbound.messaging.microsoft.com [213.199.154.250]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.global.frontbridge.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92E152C00A3 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 11:51:06 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <5248D94E.7080904@freescale.com> Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 09:52:14 +0800 From: Lian Minghuan-b31939 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Timur Tabi , Minghuan Lian Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pci: fsl: rework PCI driver compatible with Layerscape References: <1379502122-20792-1-git-send-email-Minghuan.Lian@freescale.com> <1379502122-20792-2-git-send-email-Minghuan.Lian@freescale.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , Zang Roy-R61911 , Scott Wood List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi Timur, Thanks for your comments. How about PCI_FSL_COMMON? Thanks, Minghuan On 09/30/2013 07:56 AM, Timur Tabi wrote: > On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Minghuan Lian > wrote: > >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig >> index 38f3b7e..6fd6348 100644 >> --- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig >> @@ -690,6 +690,7 @@ config FSL_SOC >> >> config FSL_PCI >> bool >> + select PCI_FSL if FSL_SOC_BOOKE || PPC_86xx > I think having two config options, one called FSL_PCI and the other > PCI_FSL, is very confusing. Surely, you can pick better names than > that? >