From: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar@freescale.com>
To: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: Varun Sethi <Varun.Sethi@freescale.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Poonam Aggrwal <poonam.aggrwal@freescale.com>,
Priyanka Jain <Priyanka.Jain@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2][v7] powerpc/mpc85xx:Add initial device tree support of T104x
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 08:56:44 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <524A40F4.9040406@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1380570471.24959.517.camel@snotra.buserror.net>
On 10/01/2013 01:17 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-09-30 at 12:24 +0530, Prabhakar Kushwaha wrote:
>> - Removed l2switch. It will be added later
> Why?
I am not aware of bindings required for l2switch as we are not working
on the driver.
Earlier I thought of putting a place holder. but as you suggested to put
bindings in documentation.
It will be good if it is put by actual driver owner.
>
>> +sata@220000 {
>> + fsl,iommu-parent = <&pamu0>;
>> + fsl,liodn-reg = <&guts 0x550>; /* SATA1LIODNR */
>> +};
>> +/include/ "qoriq-sata2-1.dtsi"
>> +sata@221000 {
>> + fsl,iommu-parent = <&pamu0>;
>> + fsl,liodn-reg = <&guts 0x554>; /* SATA2LIODNR */
>> +};
> Whitespace
do we have any scripts which check for whitespace as checkpatch never
give any warning/error.
it is a very silly mistake which I am doing continuously :(
>> +/include/ "qoriq-sec5.0-0.dtsi"
>> +};
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/t1042si-post.dtsi b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/t1042si-post.dtsi
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..f286a50
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/t1042si-post.dtsi
>> @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
>> +/*
>> + * T1042 Silicon/SoC Device Tree Source (post include)
>> + *
>> + * Copyright 2013 Freescale Semiconductor Inc.
>> + *
>> + * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
>> + * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
>> + * * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
>> + * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
>> + * * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
>> + * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
>> + * documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
>> + * * Neither the name of Freescale Semiconductor nor the
>> + * names of its contributors may be used to endorse or promote products
>> + * derived from this software without specific prior written permission.
>> + *
>> + *
>> + * ALTERNATIVELY, this software may be distributed under the terms of the
>> + * GNU General Public License ("GPL") as published by the Free Software
>> + * Foundation, either version 2 of that License or (at your option) any
>> + * later version.
>> + *
>> + * THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY Freescale Semiconductor ``AS IS'' AND ANY
>> + * EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED
>> + * WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE
>> + * DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL Freescale Semiconductor BE LIABLE FOR ANY
>> + * DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES
>> + * (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES;
>> + * LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND
>> + * ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
>> + * (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS
>> + * SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
>> + */
>> +
>> +/include/ "t1040si-post.dtsi"
> Should at least have a comment indicating that eventually this should
> hold the l2 switch node.
yes. Ideally it should be.
but if I put a comment then I believe this patch will not be completed.
it will think as a RFC.
as I believe putting of TODO is generally for RFC patches.
>> + aliases {
>> + ccsr = &soc;
>> + dcsr = &dcsr;
>> +
>> + serial0 = &serial0;
>> + serial1 = &serial1;
>> + serial2 = &serial2;
>> + serial3 = &serial3;
>> + pci0 = &pci0;
>> + pci1 = &pci1;
>> + pci2 = &pci2;
>> + pci3 = &pci3;
>> + usb0 = &usb0;
>> + usb1 = &usb1;
>> + sdhc = &sdhc;
>> +
>> + crypto = &crypto;
>> +
>> + };
>> +
>> + cpus {
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
> [snip]
>> + L2_4: l2-cache {
>> + next-level-cache = <&cpc>;
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> + };
>> +};
> Don't leave a blank line before a closing brace.
my mistake. I will take care.
Thanks,
Prabhakar
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-01 3:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-30 6:54 [PATCH 1/2][v7] powerpc/mpc85xx:Add initial device tree support of T104x Prabhakar Kushwaha
2013-09-30 19:47 ` Scott Wood
2013-10-01 3:26 ` Prabhakar Kushwaha [this message]
2013-10-01 19:56 ` Scott Wood
2013-10-02 12:31 ` Prabhakar Kushwaha
2013-10-03 9:35 ` Vlad Bogdan-BOGVLAD1
2013-10-01 3:49 ` Prabhakar Kushwaha
2013-10-04 3:16 ` Timur Tabi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=524A40F4.9040406@freescale.com \
--to=prabhakar@freescale.com \
--cc=Priyanka.Jain@freescale.com \
--cc=Varun.Sethi@freescale.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=poonam.aggrwal@freescale.com \
--cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).