From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: tytso@mit.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, agraf@suse.de,
herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au, mpm@selenic.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] KVM: PPC: Book3S: Add support for hwrng found on some powernv systems
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 10:46:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <524BDD73.3020106@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131002050940.GA25363@drongo>
Il 02/10/2013 07:09, Paul Mackerras ha scritto:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 01:19:06PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>> Anyhow, I would like to know more about this hwrng and hypercall.
>>
>> Does the hwrng return random numbers (like rdrand) or real entropy (like
>> rdseed that Intel will add in Broadwell)? What about the hypercall?
>
> Well, firstly, your terminology is inaccurate. Real entropy will give
> you random numbers. I think when you say "random numbers" you
> actually mean "pseudo-random numbers".
Yes---I meant pseudo-random numbers where the generator is periodically
seeded by a random number.
> Secondly, the RNG produces real entropy.
Good to know, thanks.
> Not sure why they are particularly "precious"; we get 64 bits per
> microsecond whether we use them or not. What are you suggesting
> arch_get_random_long() should do instead?
If you are running rngd, there is no need to have arch_get_random_long()
at all.
>> 3) If the hypercall returns random numbers, then it is a pretty
>> braindead interface since returning 8 bytes at a time limits the
>> throughput to a handful of MB/s (compare to 200 MB/sec for x86 rdrand).
>> But more important: in this case drivers/char/hw_random/pseries-rng.c
>> is completely broken and insecure, just like patch 2 in case (1) above.
>
> Assuming that by "random numbers" you actually mean "pseudo-random
> numbers", then this doesn't apply.
Indeed.
>> 4) If the hypercall returns entropy (same as virtio-rng), the same
>> considerations on speed apply. If you can only produce entropy at say 1
>> MB/s (so reading 8 bytes take 8 microseconds---which is actually very
>> fast), it doesn't matter that much to spend 7 microseconds on a
>> userspace roundtrip. It's going to be only half the speed of bare
>> metal, not 100 times slower.
>
> 8 bytes takes at most 1 microsecond, so the round-trip to userspace is
> definitely noticeable.
Thanks. Any chance you can give some numbers of a kernel hypercall and
a userspace hypercall on Power, so we have actual data? For example a
hypercall that returns H_PARAMETER as soon as possible.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-02 8:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-26 6:31 [PATCH 1/3] powerpc: Implement arch_get_random_long/int() for powernv Michael Ellerman
2013-09-26 6:31 ` [PATCH 2/3] hwrng: Add a driver for the hwrng found in power7+ systems Michael Ellerman
2013-09-26 8:01 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-10-01 8:25 ` Michael Ellerman
2013-09-26 6:31 ` [PATCH 3/3] KVM: PPC: Book3S: Add support for hwrng found on some powernv systems Michael Ellerman
2013-09-26 9:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-10-01 8:34 ` Michael Ellerman
2013-10-01 8:39 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-10-01 9:23 ` Paul Mackerras
2013-10-01 9:57 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-10-01 10:00 ` Alexander Graf
2013-10-01 9:38 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-10-01 11:19 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-10-01 21:44 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-10-02 8:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-10-02 5:09 ` Paul Mackerras
2013-10-02 8:46 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2013-10-02 9:06 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-10-02 9:11 ` Alexander Graf
2013-10-02 9:50 ` Alexander Graf
2013-10-02 10:02 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-10-02 13:57 ` Michael Ellerman
2013-10-02 14:08 ` Alexander Graf
2013-10-02 14:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-10-02 14:36 ` Alexander Graf
2013-10-02 14:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-10-02 22:45 ` Paul Mackerras
2013-10-03 5:48 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-10-03 10:06 ` Paul Mackerras
2013-10-03 12:08 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-10-02 14:37 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-10-02 22:21 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-10-03 6:08 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-10-02 22:13 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-10-02 14:10 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-10-02 22:15 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-10-02 22:02 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-10-03 5:43 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-10-03 7:22 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-10-02 22:07 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-10-03 6:28 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-10-02 21:58 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-10-01 9:58 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-09-27 14:15 ` Anshuman Khandual
2013-10-01 8:36 ` Michael Ellerman
2013-09-26 7:58 ` [PATCH 1/3] powerpc: Implement arch_get_random_long/int() for powernv Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=524BDD73.3020106@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).