From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from service87.mimecast.com (service87.mimecast.com [91.220.42.44]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 762102C03BD for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 21:32:39 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <527231DA.9060002@arm.com> Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 10:32:58 +0000 From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] of: move definition of of_find_next_cache_node into common code. References: <1379501585-12532-1-git-send-email-Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com> <1379501585-12532-3-git-send-email-Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com> <1383196834.28909.7.camel@pasglop> In-Reply-To: <1383196834.28909.7.camel@pasglop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "grant.likely@linaro.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , "rob.herring@calxeda.com" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi Ben, On 31/10/13 05:20, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 11:53 +0100, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote: >> From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha >> >> Since the definition of_find_next_cache_node is architecture independent= , >> the existing definition in powerpc can be moved to driver/of/base.c >> >> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt >> Cc: Grant Likely >> Cc: Rob Herring >> Signed-off-by: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha >=20 > I've seen no follow up on that, I'm happy to stick it in powerpc-next > with some other late stuff. >=20 Thanks for the follow up. Grant wanted to see usage of this outside PPC and= I pointed him[0] to the RFC[1] I had posted to support cacheinfo on ARM. These patches are based on v3.12-rc1, let me know if you want me to rebase/repost on any particular version. Regards, Sudeep [0] http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg05174.html [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/18/340