From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ee0-x22a.google.com (mail-ee0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c00::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB39B2C0399 for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 09:17:47 +1100 (EST) Received: by mail-ee0-f42.google.com with SMTP id c1so1732243eek.15 for ; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 14:17:41 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52796E82.5010800@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 23:17:38 +0100 From: Sebastian Hesselbarth To: Arnaud Ebalard , Jason Gunthorpe Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: mv643xx_eth: Add missing phy_addr_set in DT mode References: <1383611239-14556-1-git-send-email-jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> <87sivacxcf.fsf@natisbad.org> In-Reply-To: <87sivacxcf.fsf@natisbad.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: Andrew Lunn , Jason Cooper , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lennert Buytenhek , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, David Miller , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 11/05/2013 11:12 PM, Arnaud Ebalard wrote: > Hi Jason, > > Jason Gunthorpe writes: > >> Commit cc9d4598 'net: mv643xx_eth: use of_phy_connect if phy_node >> present' made the call to phy_scan optional, if the DT has a link to >> the phy node. >> >> However phy_scan has the side effect of calling phy_addr_set, which >> writes the phy MDIO address to the ethernet controller. If phy_addr_set >> is not called, and the bootloader has not set the correct address then >> the driver will fail to function. > > Thanks *a lot* for fixing this one! I had the issue on my ReadyNAS 102 > (Armada 370 based) which I had put on a todo list and temporarily Erm, just to make sure: Armada 370 isn't using mv643xx_eth but mvneta, are you sure it is (was) related to Jason's fix? Sebastian > workarounded by including a 'ping whatever' call in my u-boot env in > order to force it to do the init. Without it, I was unable to properly > use the interface. With your fix, after multiple reboots to test it, > everything works as expected. So, FWIW: > > Tested-by: Arnaud Ebalard