From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org>,
Sathvika Vasireddy <sv@linux.ibm.com>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 14/14] powerpc: Implement UACCESS validation on PPC32
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 16:03:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52816249-0d38-31f6-cc0b-ce85c0107f72@csgroup.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230622115659.GO4253@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Le 22/06/2023 à 13:56, Peter Zijlstra a écrit :
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 12:54:36PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/tools/objtool/check.c b/tools/objtool/check.c
>> index f850ab892ad5..8ac5711a055f 100644
>> --- a/tools/objtool/check.c
>> +++ b/tools/objtool/check.c
>> @@ -218,6 +218,7 @@ static bool __dead_end_function(struct objtool_file *file, struct symbol *func,
>> "kthread_exit",
>> "kunit_try_catch_throw",
>> "lbug_with_loc",
>> + "longjmp",
>> "machine_real_restart",
>> "make_task_dead",
>> "mpt_halt_firmware",
>> @@ -230,7 +231,9 @@ static bool __dead_end_function(struct objtool_file *file, struct symbol *func,
>> "sev_es_terminate",
>> "snp_abort",
>> "start_kernel",
>> + "start_secondary_resume",
>> "stop_this_cpu",
>> + "unrecoverable_exception",
>> "usercopy_abort",
>> "x86_64_start_kernel",
>> "x86_64_start_reservations",
>
> Someone went and changed all that in tip/objtool/core :-)
>
> But perhaps, like the uaccess_safe_builtins[] array below, should we
> start marking sections so we can remember where stuff comes from later?
Or, now that it is a H file, maybe each arch could have its own H file
for arch specific functions ? Then we'd get:
diff --git a/tools/objtool/arch/powerpc/include/arch/noreturns.h
b/tools/objtool/arch/powerpc/include/arch/noreturns.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..664f17d39026
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/objtool/arch/powerpc/include/arch/noreturns.h
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+
+/*
+ * This is a (sorted!) list of all known __noreturn functions in
arch/powerpc.
+ * It's needed for objtool to properly reverse-engineer the control
flow graph.
+ *
+ * Yes, this is unfortunate. A better solution is in the works.
+ */
+NORETURN(longjmp)
+NORETURN(start_secondary_resume)
+NORETURN(unrecoverable_exception)
diff --git a/tools/objtool/noreturns.h b/tools/objtool/noreturns.h
index 1514e84d5cc4..f725ed37532d 100644
--- a/tools/objtool/noreturns.h
+++ b/tools/objtool/noreturns.h
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+#include <arch/noreturns.h>
+
/*
* This is a (sorted!) list of all known __noreturn functions in the
kernel.
* It's needed for objtool to properly reverse-engineer the control
flow graph.
>
>> @@ -1335,6 +1338,8 @@ static const char *uaccess_safe_builtin[] = {
>> "rep_stos_alternative",
>> "rep_movs_alternative",
>> "__copy_user_nocache",
>> + "__copy_tofrom_user",
>> + "__arch_clear_user",
>> NULL
>> };
>
> Do we want to rename the 'misc' sectino to 'x86' and start a 'ppc32'
> section there?
>
Sure.
Then that would look like:
diff --git a/tools/objtool/check.c b/tools/objtool/check.c
index 2b61f8180bea..2d564d0e2ae1 100644
--- a/tools/objtool/check.c
+++ b/tools/objtool/check.c
@@ -1259,13 +1259,15 @@ static const char *uaccess_safe_builtin[] = {
"stackleak_track_stack",
/* misc */
"csum_partial_copy_generic",
+ "ftrace_likely_update", /* CONFIG_TRACE_BRANCH_PROFILING */
+ /* misc x86 */
"copy_mc_fragile",
"copy_mc_fragile_handle_tail",
"copy_mc_enhanced_fast_string",
- "ftrace_likely_update", /* CONFIG_TRACE_BRANCH_PROFILING */
"rep_stos_alternative",
"rep_movs_alternative",
"__copy_user_nocache",
+ /* misc powerpc */
"__copy_tofrom_user",
"__arch_clear_user",
NULL
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-23 16:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-22 10:54 [PATCH v2 00/14] powerpc/objtool: uaccess validation for PPC32 (v2) Christophe Leroy
2023-06-22 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] powerpc/kuap: Avoid unnecessary reads of MD_AP Christophe Leroy
2023-06-22 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] powerpc/kuap: Avoid useless jump_label on empty function Christophe Leroy
2023-06-22 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] powerpc/kuap: Refactor static branch for disabling kuap Christophe Leroy
2023-06-22 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] powerpc/kuap: Make disabling KUAP at boottime impossible except on book3s/64 Christophe Leroy
2023-06-22 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] powerpc/kuap: KUAP enabling/disabling functions must be __always_inline Christophe Leroy
2023-06-22 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 06/14] Revert "powerpc/bug: Provide better flexibility to WARN_ON/__WARN_FLAGS() with asm goto" Christophe Leroy
2023-06-22 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 07/14] objtool: Allow an architecture to disable objtool on ASM files Christophe Leroy
2023-06-22 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 08/14] objtool: Fix JUMP_ENTRY_SIZE for bi-arch like powerpc Christophe Leroy
2023-06-22 11:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-22 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 09/14] objtool: Add INSN_RETURN_CONDITIONAL Christophe Leroy
2023-06-22 11:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-22 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] objtool: Add support for relative switch tables Christophe Leroy
2023-06-22 11:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-23 15:09 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-06-22 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] objtool: Remove too strict constraint in jump table search Christophe Leroy
2023-06-22 11:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-22 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 12/14] objtool: Add support for more complex UACCESS control Christophe Leroy
2023-06-22 11:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-22 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] powerpc/bug: Annotate reachable after warning trap Christophe Leroy
2023-06-22 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] powerpc: Implement UACCESS validation on PPC32 Christophe Leroy
2023-06-22 11:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-23 16:03 ` Christophe Leroy [this message]
2023-06-22 19:16 ` kernel test robot
2023-06-22 20:07 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52816249-0d38-31f6-cc0b-ce85c0107f72@csgroup.eu \
--to=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=naveen@kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sv@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox