From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (ch1ehsobe003.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.181.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.global.frontbridge.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F0742C00BB for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 10:01:24 +1100 (EST) Received: from mail213-ch1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail213-ch1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2D13300958 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 23:01:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from CH1EHSMHS040.bigfish.com (snatpool1.int.messaging.microsoft.com [10.43.68.240]) by mail213-ch1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38E5D4005F for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 23:01:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.214.83.60] ([10.214.83.60]) by az84smr01.freescale.net (8.14.3/8.14.0) with ESMTP id rACN1Dt5032563 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 16:01:14 -0700 Message-ID: <5282B277.4090300@Freescale.com> Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 16:57:59 -0600 From: Emil Medve MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] powerpc/85xx: Merge 85xx/p1023_defconfig into mpc85xx_smp_defconfig and mpc85xx_defconfig References: <1383952632-5770-1-git-send-email-Lijun.Pan@freescale.com> <1384197913-24610-1-git-send-email-Lijun.Pan@freescale.com> <1384293891.1403.70.camel__45039.5534084693$1384293935$gmane$org@snotra.buserror.net> In-Reply-To: <1384293891.1403.70.camel__45039.5534084693$1384293935$gmane$org@snotra.buserror.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hello Scott, On 11/12/2013 04:04 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 13:25 -0600, Lijun Pan wrote: >> mpc85xx_smp_defconfig and mpc85xx_defconfig already have CONFIG_P1023RDS=y. >> Merge CONFIG_P1023RDB=y and other relevant configurations into mpc85xx_smp_defconfig and mpc85_defconfig. >> >> Signed-off-by: Lijun Pan >> --- >> arch/powerpc/configs/85xx/p1023_defconfig | 188 ---------------------------- >> arch/powerpc/configs/mpc85xx_defconfig | 18 +++ >> arch/powerpc/configs/mpc85xx_smp_defconfig | 17 +++ >> 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 188 deletions(-) >> delete mode 100644 arch/powerpc/configs/85xx/p1023_defconfig > > Are we still going to want to have one defconfig if and when we finally > get datapath support upstream? That's a lot of code to add to the 85xx > config just for this one chip. Yes. But for mpc85xx_/smp_defconfig the datapath support shouldn't be enabled by default given that just one SoC in that family has the datapath (and we don't plan to put it in another e500v2 based SoC). For regression/automation purposes config fragments should be used Cheers,