From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.193]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BA1367A6C for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:48:22 +1100 (EST) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 57so784894wri for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 15:48:20 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <528646bc05021515486bd9f926@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 16:48:19 -0700 From: Grant Likely To: Sylvain Munaut , linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Lite5200 full duplex support Reply-To: Grant Likely List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , I'm using Sylvain's http://bkbits.246tnt.com:14690/linux-2.5-mpc52xx bk tree on a lite5200 evb. I noticed that the FEC driver is hard coded to only support half duplex 10/100 auto-negotiation. Is that intentional? Are there any known problems with running full duplex? I modified the code to allow full duplex and I haven't observed any problems yet. (w/ nfsroot and compiling apps on the target natively) Cheers, g. BTW, here's what I changed: drivers/net/fec_mpc52xx/fec_phy.c line 294 (phy_info_lxt971) from: { mk_mii_write(MII_REG_ANAR, 0x0A1), NULL }, /* 10/100, HD */ to: { mk_mii_write(MII_REG_ANAR, 0x1E1), NULL }, /* 10/100, HD */