From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.171]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 273C467BD2 for ; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 04:21:40 +1000 (EST) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id e2so1975207ugf for ; Wed, 02 Aug 2006 11:21:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <528646bc0608021121l124cd3e8i14dfdfbf40272193@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 12:21:37 -0600 From: "Grant Likely" Sender: glikely@gmail.com To: "Mark A. Greer" Subject: Re: RFC: Location for Device Tree Sources? In-Reply-To: <20060802182319.GI17652@mag.az.mvista.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed References: <1154464346.19994.4.camel@cashmere.sps.mot.com> <1154466094.11069.6.camel@localhost> <20060802003504.GA20439@mag.az.mvista.com> <1154481150.2676.3.camel@vader.jdub.homelinux.org> <528646bc0608012020l11690cf7wbb7d93e6ba6eae90@mail.gmail.com> <20060802182319.GI17652@mag.az.mvista.com> Cc: "linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" , Guennadi Liakhovetski List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 8/2/06, Mark A. Greer wrote: > On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 09:20:52PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > > I have to second that opinion. The device tree is absolutely integral > > with the rest of the code/drivers needed to support a board. I say > > there are stronger arguments for keeping the dts files in the kernel > > source than there are for the boot wrapper. > > Well, the dts is no good to you without dtc so do we put dtc in the > kernel source tree too? I don't know; should we include gcc also? :p -- Grant Likely, B.Sc. P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. grant.likely@secretlab.ca (403) 399-0195