From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.186]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD9FB67B9F for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 02:24:45 +1000 (EST) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c2so2072976nfe for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 09:24:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <528646bc0608210924v7dbc55a4gbe2505d15ae42d40@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 10:24:42 -0600 From: "Grant Likely" Sender: glikely@gmail.com To: "Wade Maxfield" Subject: Re: PPC beginner questions In-Reply-To: <45a1b53e0608210907k6acec26ag94b0621273109532@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed References: <45a1b53e0608210651s4f5de382w77e092463dbbf5b7@mail.gmail.com> <528646bc0608210714g51928043lb729e80bda753d4d@mail.gmail.com> <45a1b53e0608210759p270c2f8dy694e91f409d57729@mail.gmail.com> <528646bc0608210838p4071f9eeie560fbba18ae2b3d@mail.gmail.com> <45a1b53e0608210907k6acec26ag94b0621273109532@mail.gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-embedded list List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 8/21/06, Wade Maxfield wrote: > On 8/21/06, Grant Likely wrote: > > On 8/21/06, Wade Maxfield wrote: > > > I'm assuming inb() outb(), inw() outw()?? I've been googling and have > > > come up short with info that makes sense. It is almost all x86 centric. > > > > in_8, in_be16, in_be32, out_8, out_be16, out_be32 for big-endian > > device registers > > in_8, in_le16, in_le32, out_8, out_le16, out_le32 for little endian > > device registers > > > -->Interesting. Do these functions do 'eieio' (Email, Internet, Electronic > Information Officer functions (southpark cartoon), err, or Enforce In-Order > Execution of Input/Output) for me, or do I have to do that? I'm still > confused as to that Old MacDonald function. The in functions do isync The out functions do eieio > > > > heh, yes you can; but if your writing new code why not use good > > practice from the start? :) > > > --> Ok, you win. How about ioread8() or inb() also? Are they not coded in > PPC correctly? Or is the in_8() more modern? read include/asm/io.h. All the IO routines are defined there. read[bwl] and write[bwl] are just macros to in_* out_*, as are inb, outb, etc. Cheers, g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc. P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. grant.likely@secretlab.ca (403) 399-0195