From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.172]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D325167D43 for ; Sat, 28 Oct 2006 17:38:20 +1000 (EST) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 30so755225ugc for ; Sat, 28 Oct 2006 00:38:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <528646bc0610280038x421014bdxde263c5399907fcb@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 01:38:18 -0600 From: "Grant Likely" Sender: glikely@gmail.com To: "Benjamin Herrenschmidt" Subject: Re: Is get_property() correct? In-Reply-To: <1162020235.25682.124.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed References: <528646bc0610272341s3c655ebbn785b373f148f6174@mail.gmail.com> <1162020235.25682.124.camel@localhost.localdomain> Cc: "linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 10/28/06, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Sat, 2006-10-28 at 00:41 -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > > Well considering that we don't know the type of the property value, the > best we can do is return a pointer to it ... > > The comment might want an update, though it never stroke me as confusing > but heh :) No, it's not confusing. Both the comment and the code are correct. I just forgot how to read code. :( g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc. P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. grant.likely@secretlab.ca (403) 399-0195