Re: [patch 08/16] powerpc: remove EMBEDDED6xx Kconfig entry

["Grant Likely" <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>]

On 11/2/06, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 07:58:39AM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On 11/2/06, s.hauer@pengutronix.de <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> > >remove EMBEDDED6xx Kconfig entry
> > >
> > >Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> > >
> > >Index: linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> > >===================================================================
> > >--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> > >+++ linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> > >@@ -338,10 +338,6 @@ config PPC_MULTIPLATFORM
> > >          RS/6000 machine, an Apple machine, or a PReP, CHRP,
> > >          Maple or Cell-based machine.
> > >
> > >-config EMBEDDED6xx
> > >-       bool "Embedded 6xx/7xx/7xxx-based board"
> > >-       depends on PPC32 && (BROKEN||BROKEN_ON_SMP)
> > >-
> > > config APUS
> > >        bool "Amiga-APUS"
> > >        depends on PPC32 && BROKEN
> > >
> > >--
> >
> > If you do this, then where should embedded 6xx board ports go?  For
> > example; mpc52xx for which there are currently patches on the mailing
> > list.
>
> I'm too working on the mpc52xx (I have nothing to submit though at the
> moment, because my port is mainly copy-paste from arch=ppc).
> I put my stuff under platforms/mpc52xx. I did this mainly because Nikolas
> states his board isn't 'embedded', but mine is. I think this shows there
> more a historical difference than a technical difference between 'embedded'
> and 'not embedded' boards.
> I'm running my board as a normal MULTIPLATFORM board and it works just
> fine.

Then perhaps Efika should also be under platforms/mpc52xx?

g.

-- 
Grant Likely, B.Sc. P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
grant.likely@secretlab.ca
(403) 399-0195