linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Grant Likely" <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
To: "Stephen Neuendorffer" <stephen.neuendorffer@xilinx.com>,
	"linuxppc-dev list" <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: Virtex device tree generator proof of concept
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 16:14:33 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <528646bc0612061514mbcb2627wbe83cd47a06b31b9@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <977C41F842E66D4CB2E41332313B615002F76196@XSJ-EXCHVS1.xlnx.xilinx.com>

On 12/6/06, Stephen Neuendorffer <stephen.neuendorffer@xilinx.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Grant,
>
> This looks really cool...  I've hacked around in it a bit to generate
> device trees that go more completely through dtc.  (I'd be happy
> to push these modifications back to you, if you're interested...)

Yes please, send me your patches.

>
> I'm curious if you've heard of anyone using device trees other than
> at boot time: for instance, using an incomplete device tree blob to
> represent components discovered at runtime?  It looks like it should
> be possible to rip out alot of the code from kernel/powerpc/prom.c in
> recent kernels to parse incomplete device trees, too...  Any thoughts?

Possible, but there are probably better ways do deal with those; like
just allocating and registering a platform device; or adding nodes to
the existing tree.  If you're able to probe a device, then do you need
to describe it with a device tree fragment?

What scenario are you thinking about?

Cheers,
g.

-- 
Grant Likely, B.Sc. P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
grant.likely@secretlab.ca
(403) 399-0195

       reply	other threads:[~2006-12-06 23:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <977C41F842E66D4CB2E41332313B615002F76196@XSJ-EXCHVS1.xlnx.xilinx.com>
2006-12-06 23:14 ` Grant Likely [this message]
2006-12-06 23:47   ` Virtex device tree generator proof of concept David Gibson
2006-12-07  0:19 Stephen Neuendorffer
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-11-29 19:16 Grant Likely

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=528646bc0612061514mbcb2627wbe83cd47a06b31b9@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=stephen.neuendorffer@xilinx.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).