From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.174]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32407DDE28 for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2007 05:38:50 +1100 (EST) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id k3so768655ugf for ; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 10:38:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <528646bc0702091038k5188d83fsbc088d875472791c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 11:38:42 -0700 From: "Grant Likely" Sender: glikely@gmail.com To: "Mark A. Greer" Subject: Re: [RFC] mpc5200 device tree bindings refinement In-Reply-To: <20070209173149.GA23362@mag.az.mvista.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed References: <11710062092006-git-send-email-grant.likely@secretlab.ca> <20070209173149.GA23362@mag.az.mvista.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 2/9/07, Mark A. Greer wrote: > On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 12:30:09AM -0700, Grant Likely wrote: > > Hi Grant, > > > Much needed refinement of mpc5200 device tree binding specifications. > > > > Short list: > > > > > - Specify reqiured 'cell-index' property to identify between multiple SOC > > devices of the same type. (Useful for arbitrating shared register access) Look here: http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2007-February/031093.html and here: http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2007-February/031004.html http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2007-February/031060.html I just used that same property name that Ben used for the EMAC to try and establish some form of convention. g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc. P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. grant.likely@secretlab.ca (403) 399-0195