linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: mikey@neuling.org, ak@linux.intel.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, eranian@google.com,
	linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, acme@ghostprotocols.net,
	sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mingo@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 09/10] power8, perf: Change BHRB branch filter configuration
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 13:50:38 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52AAC356.1000308@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131209062147.51F822C00C5@ozlabs.org>

On 12/09/2013 11:51 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> 
> As I said in my comments on version 3 which you ignored:
> 
>     I think it would be clearer if we actually checked for the possibilities we
>     allow and let everything else fall through, eg:
> 
> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â /* Ignore user/kernel/hv bits */
> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â branch_sample_type &= ~PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PLM_ALL;
> 
> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â if (branch_sample_type == PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY)
> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â return 0;
> 
> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â if (branch_sample_type == PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY_CALL)
> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â return POWER8_MMCRA_IFM1;
> Â 
> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â if (branch_sample_type == PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_COND)
> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â return POWER8_MMCRA_IFM3;
> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 
> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â return -1;
> 

Hey Michael,

This patch only adds support for the PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_COND filter, if the
over all code flow does not clearly suggest that all combinations of any of
these HW filters are invalid, then we can go with one more patch to clean
that up before or after this patch but not here in this patch. Finally the
code section here will look something like this. Does it sound good ?

static u64 power8_bhrb_filter_map(u64 branch_sample_type)
{
        u64 pmu_bhrb_filter = 0;

        /* BHRB and regular PMU events share the same privilege state
         * filter configuration. BHRB is always recorded along with a
         * regular PMU event. As the privilege state filter is handled
         * in the basic PMC configuration of the accompanying regular
         * PMU event, we ignore any separate BHRB specific request.
         */

        /* Ignore user, kernel, hv bits */
        branch_sample_type &= ~PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PLM_ALL;

        if (branch_sample_type == PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY)
                return pmu_bhrb_filter;


        if (branch_sample_type == PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY_CALL) {
                pmu_bhrb_filter |= POWER8_MMCRA_IFM1;
                return pmu_bhrb_filter;
        }

        if (branch_sample_type == PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_COND) {
                pmu_bhrb_filter |= POWER8_MMCRA_IFM3;
                return pmu_bhrb_filter;
        }

        /* Every thing else is unsupported */
        return -1;
}

  reply	other threads:[~2013-12-13  8:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-04 10:32 [PATCH V4 00/10] perf: New conditional branch filter Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-04 10:32 ` [PATCH V4 01/10] perf: Add PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_COND Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-04 10:32 ` [PATCH V4 02/10] powerpc, perf: Enable conditional branch filter for POWER8 Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-04 10:32 ` [PATCH V4 03/10] perf, tool: Conditional branch filter 'cond' added to perf record Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-04 10:32 ` [PATCH V4 04/10] x86, perf: Add conditional branch filtering support Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-06 16:46   ` Andi Kleen
2013-12-04 10:32 ` [PATCH V4 05/10] perf, documentation: Description for conditional branch filter Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-04 10:32 ` [PATCH V4 06/10] powerpc, perf: Change the name of HW PMU branch filter tracking variable Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-04 10:32 ` [PATCH V4 07/10] powerpc, lib: Add new branch instruction analysis support functions Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-09  6:21   ` Michael Ellerman
2013-12-10  6:09     ` Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-20 10:06       ` Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-04 10:32 ` [PATCH V4 08/10] powerpc, perf: Enable SW filtering in branch stack sampling framework Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-09  6:21   ` Michael Ellerman
2013-12-10  5:57     ` Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-12  8:45       ` Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-13  2:47         ` Michael Ellerman
2013-12-20 11:01     ` Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-24  3:29       ` Michael Ellerman
2013-12-24  3:50         ` Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-24  4:35           ` Michael Ellerman
2013-12-04 10:32 ` [PATCH V4 09/10] power8, perf: Change BHRB branch filter configuration Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-09  6:21   ` Michael Ellerman
2013-12-13  8:20     ` Anshuman Khandual [this message]
2013-12-18  0:08       ` Michael Ellerman
2013-12-18  3:55         ` Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-04 10:32 ` [PATCH V4 10/10] powerpc, perf: Cleanup SW branch filter list look up Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-09  6:21   ` Michael Ellerman
2013-12-20 11:06     ` Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-05  4:47 ` [PATCH V4 00/10] perf: New conditional branch filter Michael Ellerman
2013-12-06 13:18   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-12-09  0:41     ` Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52AAC356.1000308@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mikey@neuling.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).