linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pseries/cpuidle: Remove redundant call to ppc64_runlatch_off() in cpu idle routines
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 09:27:03 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52D3640F.2060805@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140109050519.11532.6044.stgit@preeti.in.ibm.com>

On 01/09/2014 10:35 AM, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
> Commit fbd7740fdfdf9475f switched pseries cpu idle handling from complete idle
> loops to ppc_md.powersave functions. Earlier to this switch,
> ppc64_runlatch_off() had to be called in each of the idle routines. But after
> the switch this call is handled in arch_cpu_idle(),just before the call
> to ppc_md.powersave, where platform specific idle routines are called.
> 
> As a consequence, the call to ppc64_runlatch_off() got duplicated in the
> arch_cpu_idle() routine as well as in the some of the idle routines in
> pseries and commit fbd7740fdfdf9475f missed to get rid of these redundant
> calls. These calls were carried over subsequent enhancements to the pseries
> cpuidle routines. This patch takes care of eliminating this redundancy.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---

Acked-by: Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Preeti, I will include this patch as part of the pseries cpuidle driver
clean-ups series which I have undertaken.

Regards,
Deepthi

>  arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/processor_idle.c |    3 ---
>  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/processor_idle.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/processor_idle.c
> index a166e38..09e4f56 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/processor_idle.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/processor_idle.c
> @@ -17,7 +17,6 @@
>  #include <asm/reg.h>
>  #include <asm/machdep.h>
>  #include <asm/firmware.h>
> -#include <asm/runlatch.h>
>  #include <asm/plpar_wrappers.h>
> 
>  struct cpuidle_driver pseries_idle_driver = {
> @@ -63,7 +62,6 @@ static int snooze_loop(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>  	set_thread_flag(TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG);
> 
>  	while ((!need_resched()) && cpu_online(cpu)) {
> -		ppc64_runlatch_off();
>  		HMT_low();
>  		HMT_very_low();
>  	}
> @@ -103,7 +101,6 @@ static int dedicated_cede_loop(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>  	idle_loop_prolog(&in_purr);
>  	get_lppaca()->donate_dedicated_cpu = 1;
> 
> -	ppc64_runlatch_off();
>  	HMT_medium();
>  	check_and_cede_processor();
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-01-13  3:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-09  5:05 [PATCH] pseries/cpuidle: Remove redundant call to ppc64_runlatch_off() in cpu idle routines Preeti U Murthy
2014-01-09  8:07 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-01-13  3:57 ` Deepthi Dharwar [this message]
2014-01-13  4:22   ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-01-13  5:38 ` Michael Ellerman
2014-01-13  6:34   ` Preeti U Murthy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52D3640F.2060805@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).