linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/tty/hvc: don't use module_init in non-modular hyp. console code
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 10:47:36 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52D7B8C8.9010301@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1389821743-25081-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>

On 15/01/14 21:35, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> The HVC_OPAL/RTAS/UDBG/XEN options are all bool, and hence their support
> is either present or absent.  It will never be modular, so using
> module_init as an alias for __initcall is rather misleading.
> 
> Fix this up now, so that we can relocate module_init from
> init.h into module.h in the future.  If we don't do this, we'd
> have to add module.h to obviously non-modular code, and that
> would be a worse thing.
> 
> Note that direct use of __initcall is discouraged, vs. one
> of the priority categorized subgroups.  As __initcall gets
> mapped onto device_initcall, our use of device_initcall
> directly in this change means that the runtime impact is
> zero -- it will remain at level 6 in initcall ordering.
> 
> Also the __exitcall functions have been outright deleted since
> they are only ever of interest to UML, and UML will never be
> using any of this code.

For the hvc_xen changes

Acked-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>

Thanks

David

      reply	other threads:[~2014-01-16 10:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-15 21:35 [PATCH v2] drivers/tty/hvc: don't use module_init in non-modular hyp. console code Paul Gortmaker
2014-01-16 10:47 ` David Vrabel [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52D7B8C8.9010301@citrix.com \
    --to=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).