linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	<linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: don't re-issue spinlock typedef that breaks older gcc
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 12:49:56 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52E7EDC4.3000102@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87sis810dl.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On 14-01-28 12:28 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> writes:
> 
>> Commit b3084f4db3aeb991c507ca774337c7e7893ed04f ("powerpc/thp: Fix
>> crash on mremap") added a "typedef struct spinlock spinlock_t;"
>> which on gcc 4.5.2 (and possibly other versions) causes many of:
>>
>> include/linux/spinlock_types.h:76:3: error: redefinition of typedef 'spinlock_t'
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h:563:25: note: previous declaration of 'spinlock_t' was here
>> In file included from include/linux/mutex.h:15:0,
>>                  from include/linux/notifier.h:13,
>>                  from include/linux/pm_qos.h:8,
>>                  from include/linux/netdevice.h:28,
>>                  from drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/wil6210.h:20,
>>                  from drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/debug.c:17:
>>
>> It appears that somewhere between gcc 4.5.2 and 4.6.3 this
>> redefinition restriction was lifted.  Using the proper header
>> from within !ASSEMBLY seems to fix it up in an acceptable way.
>>
>> Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
>> ---
>>
> 
> 
> http://mid.gmane.org/1389939036.3000.7.camel@ThinkPad-T5421.cn.ibm.com
> 
> This was posted earlier.

I see.  Well I guess Ben didn't use it since it is the same as the
temporary not-signed-off-by hack patch I posted earlier as well.

https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/1/27/584

I believe what I've posted here below to be the proper fix.

Paul.
--


> 
> 
> 
>> [ Note that b3084f4db3 isn't mainline yet, it is currently in
>>   benh/powerpc.git #merge -- but is headed there soon via:
>>              https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/1/27/599           ]
>>
>>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h | 3 ++-
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h
>> index d27960c89a71..3b638411646a 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h
>> @@ -111,6 +111,8 @@
>>
>>  #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>>
>> +#include <linux/spinlock_types.h>
>> +
>>  /*
>>   * This is the default implementation of various PTE accessors, it's
>>   * used in all cases except Book3S with 64K pages where we have a
>> @@ -560,7 +562,6 @@ extern void pmdp_invalidate(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
>>  			    pmd_t *pmdp);
>>
>>  #define pmd_move_must_withdraw pmd_move_must_withdraw
>> -typedef struct spinlock spinlock_t;
>>  static inline int pmd_move_must_withdraw(spinlock_t *new_pmd_ptl,
>>  					 spinlock_t *old_pmd_ptl)
>>  {
>> -- 
>> 1.8.5.2
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-28 17:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-28 16:16 [PATCH] powerpc: don't re-issue spinlock typedef that breaks older gcc Paul Gortmaker
2014-01-28 17:28 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2014-01-28 17:49   ` Paul Gortmaker [this message]
2014-01-28 18:49     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2014-01-28 19:07       ` Paul Gortmaker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52E7EDC4.3000102@windriver.com \
    --to=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).