From: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org mailing list" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org list"
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PPC: KVM: fix VCPU run for HV KVM
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 19:03:12 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52F09EC0.60201@ozlabs.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AF6669B4-EF1A-44BD-9034-8824EFD94B5B@suse.de>
On 01/13/2014 02:44 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 10.01.2014, at 08:21, Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> wrote:
>
>> When write to MMIO happens and there is an ioeventfd for that and
>> is handled successfully, ioeventfd_write() returns 0 (success) and
>> kvmppc_handle_store() returns EMULATE_DONE. Then kvmppc_emulate_mmio()
>> converts EMULATE_DONE to RESUME_GUEST_NV and this broke from the loop.
>>
>> This adds handling of RESUME_GUEST_NV in kvmppc_vcpu_run_hv().
>>
>> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
>> Suggested-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
>> ---
>>
>> This definitely needs a better commit message. Please, help.
>> ps. it seems like ioeventfd never worked on ppc64. hm.
>>
>> ---
>> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
>> index 072287f..24f363f 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
>> @@ -1569,7 +1569,7 @@ static int kvmppc_vcpu_run_hv(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> vcpu->arch.fault_dar, vcpu->arch.fault_dsisr);
>> srcu_read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu, srcu_idx);
>> }
>> - } while (r == RESUME_GUEST);
>> + } while ((r == RESUME_GUEST_NV) || (r == RESUME_GUEST));
>
> How about
>
> while(!(r & RESUME_FLAG_HOST));
Rather "while(!(r & RESUME_FLAG_HOST) && (r > 0));" and still not obvious
that this is really better.
Paul agrees with the original patch (and made a better commit message for
our internal tree) but I just cannot make him reply in this thread, keep
constantly asking him but to no avail :)
> That should cover all RESUME_GUEST_XXX cases just fine. Apart from that
> I agree that we should check for ! FLAG_HOST bit rather than the actual
> RESUME_GUEST value in all case where we check for it (read: please
> update all places).
There are 3 places remotely similar to this and none of them requires a fix
like above.
--
Alexey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-04 8:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-10 7:21 [PATCH] PPC: KVM: fix VCPU run for HV KVM Alexey Kardashevskiy
2014-01-12 15:44 ` Alexander Graf
2014-02-04 8:03 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy [this message]
2014-02-04 8:09 ` Alexander Graf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52F09EC0.60201@ozlabs.ru \
--to=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).