From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e28smtp09.in.ibm.com (e28smtp09.in.ibm.com [122.248.162.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78FA32C034F for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 14:26:47 +1100 (EST) Received: from /spool/local by e28smtp09.in.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 08:56:45 +0530 Received: from d28relay04.in.ibm.com (d28relay04.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.61]) by d28dlp01.in.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF360E0056 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 09:00:22 +0530 (IST) Received: from d28av05.in.ibm.com (d28av05.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.67]) by d28relay04.in.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id s253QkWq56492248 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 08:56:46 +0530 Received: from d28av05.in.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d28av05.in.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id s253Qg7W006608 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 08:56:43 +0530 Message-ID: <53169971.8050607@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 08:56:41 +0530 From: Vasant Hegde MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stewart Smith , Mahesh J Salgaonkar , benh@kernel.crashing.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/powernv: Read OPAL error log and export it through sysfs References: <87k3cin5kd.fsf@river.au.ibm.com> <1393549112-6101-1-git-send-email-stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <5315C7B6.1030602@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <87vbvtjtmh.fsf@river.au.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <87vbvtjtmh.fsf@river.au.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 03/05/2014 07:26 AM, Stewart Smith wrote: > Vasant Hegde writes: >>> +int64_t opal_send_ack_elog(uint64_t log_id); >> >> Stewart, >> >> Why are you creating 64bit log ID when actual ID is 32bit ? > > IIRC it's what OPAL gives us, even though FSP MBOX spec says 32bit. > Stewart, Better ask OPAL folks to fix in firmware ? -Vasant