From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e23smtp09.au.ibm.com (e23smtp09.au.ibm.com [202.81.31.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D6CF2C00CE for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 20:56:35 +1100 (EST) Received: from /spool/local by e23smtp09.au.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 19:56:33 +1000 Received: from d23relay05.au.ibm.com (d23relay05.au.ibm.com [9.190.235.152]) by d23dlp03.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 582E23578047 for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 20:56:29 +1100 (EST) Received: from d23av02.au.ibm.com (d23av02.au.ibm.com [9.190.235.138]) by d23relay05.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id s2L9a73K9896332 for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 20:36:07 +1100 Received: from d23av02.au.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d23av02.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id s2L9uSro026493 for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 20:56:28 +1100 Message-ID: <532C0CBD.1060904@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 15:26:13 +0530 From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] powernv, cpufreq:Add per-core locking to serialize frequency transitions References: <1395317460-14811-1-git-send-email-ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1395317460-14811-3-git-send-email-ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: "Gautham R. Shenoy" , Linux PM list , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 03/21/2014 02:12 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 5:40 PM, Gautham R. Shenoy > wrote: >> From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" >> >> On POWER systems, the CPU frequency is controlled at a core-level and >> hence we need to serialize so that only one of the threads in the core >> switches the core's frequency at a time. > > Probably you don't need this anymore. > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/21/23 > Agreed. Regards, Srivatsa S. Bhat