From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from service87.mimecast.com (service87.mimecast.com [91.220.42.44]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A85552C00CB for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 23:03:56 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <532C2ACD.7070107@arm.com> Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:04:29 +0000 From: Sudeep Holla MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anshuman Khandual Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC/RFT v3 6/9] powerpc: move cacheinfo sysfs to generic cacheinfo infrastructure References: <1392825976-17633-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <1392825976-17633-7-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <531945D1.7010503@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <531963D9.5040701@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <531D9E3A.7040109@arm.com> <532BB5AC.3000904@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <532BB5AC.3000904@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252 Cc: "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , Paul Mackerras , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Sudeep Holla List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi Anshuman, On 21/03/14 03:44, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > On 03/10/2014 04:42 PM, Sudeep Holla wrote: >> Hi Anshuman, >> >> On 07/03/14 06:14, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >>> On 03/07/2014 09:36 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >>>> On 02/19/2014 09:36 PM, Sudeep Holla wrote: >>>>> From: Sudeep Holla >>>>> >>>>> This patch removes the redundant sysfs cacheinfo code by making use o= f >>>>> the newly introduced generic cacheinfo infrastructure. [...] >>>> When it is UNIFIED we return index 0, which is correct. But the index >>>> for instruction and data cache seems to be swapped which wrong. This >>>> will fetch invalid properties for any given cache type. >>>> >> >> Ah, that's silly mistake on my side, will fix it. >> >>>> I have done some initial review and testing for this patch's impact on >>>> PowerPC (ppc64 POWER specifically). I am trying to do some code clean-= up >>>> and re-arrangements. Will post out soon. Thanks ! >> >> Thanks for taking time for testing and reviewing these patches. >=20 > Now that you got some of the problems to work on and resend the patches, = I will > hold on to the clean up patches I had. >=20 I have done most of the changes but still unable to find why the shared_cpu= _map is getting incorrect on PPC. All the other wrong entries are fixed. Any clu= e on shared_cpu_map ? Regards, Sudeep