From: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, riel@redhat.com,
rusty@rustcorp.com.au, peterz@infradead.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
ak@linux.intel.com, paulus@samba.org, mgorman@suse.de,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
mingo@kernel.org, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm: move FAULT_AROUND_ORDER to arch/
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 10:15:42 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <533B95F6.2010303@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5331C1C9.5020309@intel.com>
On Tuesday 25 March 2014 11:20 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 03/25/2014 10:36 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * Fault around order is a control knob to decide the fault around pages.
>>>> + * Default value is set to 0UL (disabled), but the arch can override it as
>>>> + * desired.
>>>> + */
>>>> +#ifndef FAULT_AROUND_ORDER
>>>> +#define FAULT_AROUND_ORDER 0UL
>>>> +#endif
>> FAULT_AROUND_ORDER == 0 case should be handled separately in
>> do_read_fault(): no reason to go to do_fault_around() if we are going to
>> fault in only one page.
>
> Isn't this the kind of thing we want to do in Kconfig?
>
>
I am still investigating this option since this looks better. But it is
taking time, my bad. I will get back on this.
With Regards
Maddy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-02 4:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-25 6:50 [PATCH 0/1] mm: FAULT_AROUND_ORDER patchset performance data for powerpc Madhavan Srinivasan
2014-03-25 6:50 ` [PATCH 1/1] mm: move FAULT_AROUND_ORDER to arch/ Madhavan Srinivasan
2014-03-25 17:36 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2014-03-25 17:50 ` Dave Hansen
2014-04-02 4:45 ` Madhavan Srinivasan [this message]
2014-03-27 6:20 ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2014-03-25 8:11 ` [PATCH 0/1] mm: FAULT_AROUND_ORDER patchset performance data for powerpc Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=533B95F6.2010303@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).