From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sema.semaphore.gr (unknown [78.46.194.137]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1732140141 for ; Sat, 26 Apr 2014 21:35:44 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <535B9A09.9060902@semaphore.gr> Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2014 14:35:37 +0300 From: Stratos Karafotis MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Prabhakar Lad Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/8] cpufreq: Use cpufreq_for_each_* macros for frequency table iteration References: <535AC26A.1000006@semaphore.gr> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Kukjin Kim , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Viresh Kumar , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , LKML , "cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" , linux-samsung-soc , Sudeep Holla , Olof Johansson , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi Prabhakar, On 26/04/2014 12:57 μμ, Prabhakar Lad wrote: > Hi Stratos, > > Thanks for the patch, > > On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 1:45 AM, Stratos Karafotis > wrote: >> The cpufreq core now supports the cpufreq_for_each_entry and >> cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry macros helpers for iteration over the >> cpufreq_frequency_table, so use them. >> >> It should have no functional changes. >> >> Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis > > For patches 1 & 2: Acked-by: Lad, Prabhakar > > and for patch 3: Acked-and-tested-by: Lad, Prabhakar > > > Thanks, > --Prabhakar lad > Thank you very much! Stratos Karafotis