From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e06smtp12.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp12.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3723314009F for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 00:39:45 +1000 (EST) Received: from /spool/local by e06smtp12.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 15:39:41 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay09.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.194]) by d06dlp02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8D562190041 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 15:39:31 +0100 (BST) Received: from d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.228]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id s3SEddeH1442296 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 14:39:39 GMT Received: from d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id s3SEdao7012448 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 08:39:38 -0600 Message-ID: <535E6804.5050508@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 16:39:00 +0200 From: Philippe Bergheaud MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anton Blanchard Subject: Re: [git pull] Please pull abiv2 branch References: <20140423124902.5be9dab0@kryten> In-Reply-To: <20140423124902.5be9dab0@kryten> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Cc: philippe.bergheaud@fr.ibm.com, mikey@neuling.org, amodra@gmail.com, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, rostedt@goodmis.org, ulrich.weigand@de.ibm.com, paulus@samba.org, mjw@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Anton Blanchard wrote: > Here are the ABIv2 patches rebased against 3.15-rc2. After recompiling 3.15-rc2 with the ABIv2 patches, I see the following line in Modules.symvers: 0x00000000 TOC. vmlinux EXPORT_SYMBOL Kernel will not load modules because TOC. has no CRC. Is this expected ? Shouldn't TOC. have a CRC ? Philippe