From: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
To: Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@freescale.com>,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, scottwood@freescale.com
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][v2] powerpc: move epapr paravirt init of power_save to an initcall
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 22:25:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53615C2F.1090603@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1398889209-10350-1-git-send-email-stuart.yoder@freescale.com>
On 30.04.14 22:20, Stuart Yoder wrote:
> From: Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@freescale.com>
>
> some restructuring of epapr paravirt init resulted in
> ppc_md.power_save being set, and then overwritten to
> NULL during machine_init. This patch splits the
> initialization of ppc_md.power_save out into a postcore
> init call.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@freescale.com>
Looks pretty good to me and IMHO should get a CC on stable when it gets
into the tree. One minor nit below.
We still need to clarify whether the omitted check on
early_init_dt_scan_epapr() is on purpose and if not reintroduce it, but
that's a separate issue.
> ---
>
> -v2: don't iterate over the entire DT, just look at
> the hypervisor node
>
> arch/powerpc/kernel/epapr_paravirt.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/epapr_paravirt.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/epapr_paravirt.c
> index 7898be9..a01df5e 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/epapr_paravirt.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/epapr_paravirt.c
> @@ -53,11 +53,6 @@ static int __init early_init_dt_scan_epapr(unsigned long node,
> #endif
> }
>
> -#if !defined(CONFIG_64BIT) || defined(CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3E_64)
> - if (of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "has-idle", NULL))
> - ppc_md.power_save = epapr_ev_idle;
> -#endif
> -
> epapr_paravirt_enabled = true;
>
> return 1;
> @@ -70,3 +65,23 @@ int __init epapr_paravirt_early_init(void)
> return 0;
> }
>
v
> +static int __init epapr_idle_init(void)
> +{
> + struct device_node *node;
> +
> + if (!epapr_paravirt_enabled)
> + return 0;
> +
> + node = of_find_node_by_path("/hypervisor");
> + if (!node)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> +#if !defined(CONFIG_64BIT) || defined(CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3E_64)
Please move the #if scope from v to ^. That way we don't waste space /
time / anything on systems that don't bother with the idle hcall.
> + if (of_get_property(node, "has-idle", NULL))
> + ppc_md.power_save = epapr_ev_idle;
> +#endif
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +postcore_initcall(epapr_idle_init);
^
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-30 20:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-30 20:20 [PATCH][v2] powerpc: move epapr paravirt init of power_save to an initcall Stuart Yoder
2014-04-30 20:25 ` Alexander Graf [this message]
2014-04-30 22:48 ` Scott Wood
2014-04-30 23:14 ` Stuart Yoder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53615C2F.1090603@suse.de \
--to=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=stuart.yoder@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).