From: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
Cc: Mihai Caraman <mihai.caraman@freescale.com>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org" <kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] KVM: PPC: Bookehv: Get vcpu's last instruction for emulation
Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 13:10:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53637D3B.4010205@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6D0F705051@AcuExch.aculab.com>
On 05/02/2014 12:12 PM, David Laight wrote:
> From: Alexander Graf
> ...
>>> + page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
>>> + eaddr = (unsigned long)kmap_atomic(page);
>>> + eaddr |= addr & ~PAGE_MASK;
>>> + *instr = *(u32 *)eaddr;
>>> + kunmap_atomic((u32 *)eaddr);
>> I think I'd rather write this as
>>
>> *instr = *(u32 *)(eaddr | (addr & ~PAGE));
>> kunmap_atomic((void*)eaddr);
>>
>> to make sure we pass the unmap function the same value we got from the
>> map function.
>>
>> Otherwise looks good to me.
> Is there any mileage in keeping a virtual address page allocated (per cpu)
> for this (and similar) accesses to physical memory?
> Not having to search for a free VA page might speed things up (if that matters).
I like the idea, though I'm not sure how that would best fit into the
current memory mapping ecosystem.
> You also probably want the page mapped uncached - no point polluting the data
> cache.
Do e500 chips have a shared I/D cache somewhere? If they do, that
particular instruction would already be there, so no pollution but nice
performance.
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-02 11:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-01 0:45 [PATCH v2 0/4] KVM: PPC: Read guest instruction from kvmppc_get_last_inst() Mihai Caraman
2014-05-01 0:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] KVM: PPC: e500mc: Revert "add load inst fixup" Mihai Caraman
2014-05-02 9:24 ` Alexander Graf
2014-05-02 23:14 ` mihai.caraman
2014-05-03 22:14 ` Alexander Graf
2014-05-06 15:48 ` mihai.caraman
2014-05-06 15:54 ` Alexander Graf
2014-05-01 0:45 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] KVM: PPC: Book3e: Add TLBSEL/TSIZE defines for MAS0/1 Mihai Caraman
2014-05-01 0:45 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] KVM: PPC: Alow kvmppc_get_last_inst() to fail Mihai Caraman
2014-05-02 9:54 ` Alexander Graf
2014-05-06 19:06 ` mihai.caraman
2014-05-08 13:31 ` Alexander Graf
2014-05-01 0:45 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] KVM: PPC: Bookehv: Get vcpu's last instruction for emulation Mihai Caraman
2014-05-02 10:01 ` Alexander Graf
2014-05-02 10:12 ` David Laight
2014-05-02 11:10 ` Alexander Graf [this message]
2014-05-02 15:32 ` Scott Wood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53637D3B.4010205@suse.de \
--to=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mihai.caraman@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).