linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: PPC: BOOK3S: PR: Fix WARN_ON with debug options on
Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 13:37:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <536A1B11.2030101@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140507055626.GA26650@iris.ozlabs.ibm.com>

On 05/07/2014 07:56 AM, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> On Sun, May 04, 2014 at 10:56:08PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> With debug option "sleep inside atomic section checking" enabled we get
>> the below WARN_ON during a PR KVM boot. This is because upstream now
>> have PREEMPT_COUNT enabled even if we have preempt disabled. Fix the
>> warning by adding preempt_disable/enable around floating point and altivec
>> enable.
> This worries me a bit.  In this code:
>
>>   	if (msr & MSR_FP) {
>> +		preempt_disable();
>>   		enable_kernel_fp();
>>   		load_fp_state(&vcpu->arch.fp);
>>   		t->fp_save_area = &vcpu->arch.fp;
>> +		preempt_enable();
> What would happen if we actually did get preempted at this point?
> Wouldn't we lose the FP state we just loaded?
>
> In other words, how come we're not already preempt-disabled at this
> point?

This is probably because we're trying to confuse Linux :). The entry 
path happens with interrupts hard disabled, but preempt enabled so that 
Linux doesn't consider the guest time as non-preemptible. That's the 
only call I could find where preempt is logically enabled (though it 
really isn't).


Alex

      parent reply	other threads:[~2014-05-07 11:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-04 17:26 [PATCH] KVM: PPC: BOOK3S: PR: Fix WARN_ON with debug options on Aneesh Kumar K.V
2014-05-05 11:29 ` Alexander Graf
2014-05-07  5:56 ` Paul Mackerras
2014-05-07  7:58   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2014-05-07 11:37   ` Alexander Graf [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=536A1B11.2030101@suse.de \
    --to=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).