From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E0E3140082 for ; Wed, 14 May 2014 21:22:16 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <537351DD.4010402@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 12:22:05 +0100 From: Pedro Alves MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Neuling Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/3] powerpc, ptrace: Enable support for transactional memory register sets References: <1399276469-13541-1-git-send-email-khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1399276469-13541-3-git-send-email-khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <537252C0.6090005@redhat.com> <53730326.6000400@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <53735044.5030008@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: avagin@openvz.org, oleg@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, michael@ellerman.id.au, Linux PPC dev , Anshuman Khandual List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 05/14/14 12:18, Michael Neuling wrote: > >> s390 actually screwed that, though it got away because >> there's a bit in HWCAP to signal transactions support. See: >> >> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2013-11/msg00080.html >> >> Are you adding something to HWCAP too? > > Yes but it's in HWCAP2 That's fine. -- Pedro Alves