From: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
To: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: aik@ozlabs.ru, alex.williamson@redhat.com,
qiudayu@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] powerpc/eeh: Avoid event on passed PE
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 11:55:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <537DC9AD.3090202@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1400747034-15045-4-git-send-email-gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 22.05.14 10:23, Gavin Shan wrote:
> If we detects frozen state on PE that has been passed through to somebody
> else. we needn't handle it. Instead, we rely on the device's owner to
> detect and recover it. The patch avoid EEH event on the frozen passed PE so
> that the device's owner can have chance to handle that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
I think you want to fold this with patch 1/3.
Alex
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c | 8 ++++++++
> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-ioda.c | 3 ++-
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
> index b90a474..aee6cc5 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
> @@ -403,6 +403,14 @@ int eeh_dev_check_failure(struct eeh_dev *edev)
> if (ret > 0)
> return ret;
>
> + /*
> + * If the PE isn't owned by us, we shouldn't check the
> + * state. Instead, let the owner handle it if the PE has
> + * been frozen.
> + */
> + if (eeh_pe_passed(pe))
> + return 0;
> +
> /* If we already have a pending isolation event for this
> * slot, we know it's bad already, we don't need to check.
> * Do this checking under a lock; as multiple PCI devices
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-ioda.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-ioda.c
> index 1b5982f..03a3ed2 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-ioda.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-ioda.c
> @@ -890,7 +890,8 @@ static int ioda_eeh_next_error(struct eeh_pe **pe)
> opal_pci_eeh_freeze_clear(phb->opal_id, frozen_pe_no,
> OPAL_EEH_ACTION_CLEAR_FREEZE_ALL);
> ret = EEH_NEXT_ERR_NONE;
> - } else if ((*pe)->state & EEH_PE_ISOLATED) {
> + } else if ((*pe)->state & EEH_PE_ISOLATED ||
> + eeh_pe_passed(*pe)) {
> ret = EEH_NEXT_ERR_NONE;
> } else {
> pr_err("EEH: Frozen PHB#%x-PE#%x (%s) detected\n",
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-22 9:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-22 8:23 [PATCH v6 0/3] EEH Support for VFIO PCI device Gavin Shan
2014-05-22 8:23 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] powerpc/eeh: Flags for passed device and PE Gavin Shan
2014-05-22 8:23 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] drivers/vfio: EEH support for VFIO PCI device Gavin Shan
2014-05-22 9:55 ` Alexander Graf
2014-05-23 0:17 ` Gavin Shan
2014-05-23 0:37 ` Gavin Shan
2014-05-23 3:23 ` Alex Williamson
2014-05-23 6:52 ` Alexander Graf
2014-05-23 11:58 ` Gavin Shan
2014-05-23 12:30 ` Alexander Graf
2014-05-23 14:49 ` Alex Williamson
2014-05-24 1:37 ` Gavin Shan
2014-05-23 12:51 ` Alex Williamson
2014-05-23 13:24 ` Alexander Graf
2014-05-23 3:10 ` Alex Williamson
2014-05-23 4:37 ` Gavin Shan
2014-05-23 5:00 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-05-23 14:36 ` Alex Williamson
2014-05-23 6:55 ` Alexander Graf
2014-05-23 7:37 ` Gavin Shan
2014-05-23 9:58 ` Alexander Graf
2014-05-23 11:55 ` Gavin Shan
2014-05-23 11:58 ` Alexander Graf
2014-05-23 12:43 ` Gavin Shan
2014-05-23 12:49 ` Alexander Graf
2014-05-24 1:46 ` Gavin Shan
2014-05-23 14:29 ` Alex Williamson
2014-05-24 2:06 ` Gavin Shan
2014-05-27 17:39 ` Alex Williamson
2014-05-22 8:23 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] powerpc/eeh: Avoid event on passed PE Gavin Shan
2014-05-22 9:55 ` Alexander Graf [this message]
2014-05-23 0:01 ` Gavin Shan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=537DC9AD.3090202@suse.de \
--to=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=qiudayu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).