From: Christian Zigotzky <chzigotzky@xenosoft.de>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Subject: Kernel 3.15: Boot problems with a PA6T board
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 11:26:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53A15B38.3080807@xenosoft.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53A15492.3090604@xenosoft.de>
Am 18.06.14 10:57, schrieb Christian Zigotzky:
> Am 18.06.14 08:51, schrieb Michael Ellerman:
>> On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 15:20 +0200, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> Could you help me to remove the changes of the PCI code, please? Or
>>> which patches shall I remove to get the old PCI code?
>> Hi Christian,
>>
>> Thanks for doing the bisect. It wasn't clear why that change was
>> causing your
>> issue, so I guess we're a bit stuck.
>>
>> Olof (on CC), was going to try and look at it when he got some spare
>> time.
>> Please keep him on CC.
>>
>> cheers
>>
>>
>>
> Hi Michael,
>
> Thank you for your answer. Adrian told me the reason about this issue.
>
> Quote Adrian:
>
> As I recall, PCI resource allocation on Nemo was always a little
> strange due to using an AMD south bridge together with the PA6T north
> bridge. The south bridge does not behave as a standard PCIe device,
> but instead presents itself as multiple devices on the PCIe root bus.
> This is not compliant with the PCIe specification. We modified the
> core powerpc PCI code so that Nemo could boot, but the changes to PCI
> code in 3.15 have broken the old workaround. I don't understand the
> PCI changes in 3.15 enough to comment further at this point.
>
> Regards,
> Adrian
>
> Quote end
>
> Cheers,
>
> Christian
But my opinion is, that's normal for the SB600 south bridge to presents
itself as multiple devices on the PCIe bus on x86 PCs. I see a lot of
PCs with SB600 south bridge on the internet. And the Linux kernel works
with this south bridge. Or is it a powerpc issue?
- Christian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-18 9:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-04 16:02 Boot problems with a PA6T board Christian Zigotzky
2014-05-05 5:48 ` Michael Ellerman
2014-05-05 9:41 ` Christian Zigotzky
2014-05-13 12:06 ` Christian Zigotzky
2014-05-26 12:26 ` Michael Ellerman
2014-05-27 23:08 ` Kernel 3.15: " Christian Zigotzky
2014-05-28 4:23 ` Michael Ellerman
2014-05-28 8:53 ` Christian Zigotzky
2014-05-28 11:25 ` Christian Zigotzky
2014-05-29 2:48 ` Michael Ellerman
2014-05-31 10:28 ` Christian Zigotzky
2014-05-31 11:01 ` Christian Zigotzky
2014-05-31 22:33 ` Christian Zigotzky
2014-06-10 10:58 ` Christian Zigotzky
2014-06-10 13:20 ` Christian Zigotzky
2014-06-18 6:51 ` Michael Ellerman
2014-06-18 8:57 ` Christian Zigotzky
2014-06-18 9:26 ` Christian Zigotzky [this message]
[not found] <25927053.1589.1403105603389.JavaMail.adrian@Gurnard>
2014-06-18 17:42 ` Christian Zigotzky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53A15B38.3080807@xenosoft.de \
--to=chzigotzky@xenosoft.de \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).