From: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Xinwei Hu <huxinwei@huawei.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
x86@kernel.org, Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, arnab.basu@freescale.com,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Wuyun <wuyun.wu@huawei.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 01/20] x86/xen/MSI: Eliminate arch_msix_mask_irq() and arch_msi_mask_irq()
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 19:11:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53E9F679.8060302@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53E9D9DD.3060901@citrix.com>
On 2014/8/12 17:09, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 12/08/14 08:25, Yijing Wang wrote:
>> Commit 0e4ccb150 added two __weak arch functions arch_msix_mask_irq()
>> and arch_msi_mask_irq() to fix a bug found when running xen in x86.
>> Introduced these two funcntions make MSI code complex. This patch
>> reverted commit 0e4ccb150 and add #ifdef for x86 msi_chip to fix this
>> bug for simplicity. Also this is preparation for using struct
>> msi_chip instead of weak arch MSI functions in all platforms.
> [...]
>> static struct irq_chip msi_chip = {
>> .name = "PCI-MSI",
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_XEN
>> + .irq_unmask = nop_unmask_msi_irq,
>> + .irq_mask = nop_mask_msi_irq,
>> +#else
>> .irq_unmask = unmask_msi_irq,
>> .irq_mask = mask_msi_irq,
>> +#endif
>
> No. CONFIG_XEN kernels can run on Xen and bare metal so this must be a
> runtime option.
Hi David, that's my mistake, what about export struct irq_chip msi_chip, then
change the msi_chip->irq_mask/irq_unmask() in xen init functions.
Eg.
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
index 19b0eba..bb6af00 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
@@ -43,6 +43,10 @@ static inline void generic_apic_probe(void)
}
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
+extern struct irq_chip msi_chip;
+#endif
+
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC
[...]
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
+void xen_nop_msi_mask(struct irq_data *data)
{
- return 0;
}
#endif
@@ -424,8 +423,8 @@ int __init pci_xen_init(void)
x86_msi.setup_msi_irqs = xen_setup_msi_irqs;
x86_msi.teardown_msi_irq = xen_teardown_msi_irq;
x86_msi.teardown_msi_irqs = xen_teardown_msi_irqs;
- x86_msi.msi_mask_irq = xen_nop_msi_mask_irq;
- x86_msi.msix_mask_irq = xen_nop_msix_mask_irq;
+ msi_chip.irq_mask = xen_nop_msi_mask;
+ msi_chip.irq_unmask = xen_nop_msi_mask;
#endif
return 0;
}
@@ -505,8 +504,8 @@ int __init pci_xen_initial_domain(void)
x86_msi.setup_msi_irqs = xen_initdom_setup_msi_irqs;
x86_msi.teardown_msi_irq = xen_teardown_msi_irq;
x86_msi.restore_msi_irqs = xen_initdom_restore_msi_irqs;
- x86_msi.msi_mask_irq = xen_nop_msi_mask_irq;
- x86_msi.msix_mask_irq = xen_nop_msix_mask_irq;
+ msi_chip.irq_mask = xen_nop_msi_mask;
+ msi_chip.irq_unmask = xen_nop_msi_mask;
#endif
xen_setup_acpi_sci();
>
> David
>
> .
>
--
Thanks!
Yijing
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-12 11:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-12 7:25 [RFC PATCH 00/20] Use msi_chip to configure MSI/MSI-X in all platforms Yijing Wang
2014-08-12 7:25 ` [RFC PATCH 01/20] x86/xen/MSI: Eliminate arch_msix_mask_irq() and arch_msi_mask_irq() Yijing Wang
2014-08-12 9:09 ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2014-08-12 11:11 ` Yijing Wang [this message]
2014-08-12 7:25 ` [RFC PATCH 02/20] MSI: Clean up struct msi_chip argument Yijing Wang
2014-08-12 7:25 ` [RFC PATCH 03/20] PCI/MSI: Remove useless bus->msi assignment Yijing Wang
2014-08-12 7:25 ` [RFC PATCH 04/20] MSI: Remove the redundant irq_set_chip_data() Yijing Wang
2014-08-12 7:25 ` [RFC PATCH 05/20] MSI: Refactor struct msi_chip to become more common Yijing Wang
2014-08-12 7:25 ` [RFC PATCH 06/20] PCI/MSI: Introduce arch_get_match_msi_chip() to find the match msi_chip Yijing Wang
2014-08-12 7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 07/20] x86/MSI: Use msi_chip instead of arch func to configure MSI/MSI-X Yijing Wang
2014-08-12 19:09 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-08-13 1:16 ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-12 7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 08/20] x86/xen/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-08-12 7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 09/20] irq_remapping/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-08-12 7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 10/20] x86/MSI: Remove unused MSI weak arch functions Yijing Wang
2014-08-12 7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 11/20] MIPS/Octeon/MSI: Use msi_chip instead of arch func to configure MSI/MSI-X Yijing Wang
2014-08-12 7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 12/20] MIPS/Xlp/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-08-12 7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 13/20] MIPS/xlr/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-08-12 7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 14/20] Powerpc/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-08-12 7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 15/20] s390/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-08-12 7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 16/20] arm/iop13xx/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-08-12 7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 17/20] IA64/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-08-12 7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 18/20] Sparc/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-08-12 7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 19/20] tile/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-08-12 7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 20/20] PCI/MSI: Clean up unused MSI arch functions Yijing Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53E9F679.8060302@huawei.com \
--to=wangyijing@huawei.com \
--cc=arnab.basu@freescale.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=cmetcalf@tilera.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=huxinwei@huawei.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=wuyun.wu@huawei.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).