linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Xinwei Hu <huxinwei@huawei.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	x86@kernel.org, Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, arnab.basu@freescale.com,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Wuyun <wuyun.wu@huawei.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 01/20] x86/xen/MSI: Eliminate arch_msix_mask_irq() and arch_msi_mask_irq()
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 19:11:53 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53E9F679.8060302@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53E9D9DD.3060901@citrix.com>

On 2014/8/12 17:09, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 12/08/14 08:25, Yijing Wang wrote:
>> Commit 0e4ccb150 added two __weak arch functions arch_msix_mask_irq()
>> and arch_msi_mask_irq() to fix a bug found when running xen in x86.
>> Introduced these two funcntions make MSI code complex. This patch
>> reverted commit 0e4ccb150 and add #ifdef for x86 msi_chip to fix this
>> bug for simplicity. Also this is preparation for using struct
>> msi_chip instead of weak arch MSI functions in all platforms.
> [...]
>>  static struct irq_chip msi_chip = {
>>  	.name			= "PCI-MSI",
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_XEN
>> +	.irq_unmask		= nop_unmask_msi_irq,
>> +	.irq_mask		= nop_mask_msi_irq,
>> +#else
>>  	.irq_unmask		= unmask_msi_irq,
>>  	.irq_mask		= mask_msi_irq,
>> +#endif
> 
> No.  CONFIG_XEN kernels can run on Xen and bare metal so this must be a
> runtime option.

Hi David, that's my mistake, what about export struct irq_chip msi_chip, then
change the msi_chip->irq_mask/irq_unmask() in xen init functions.


Eg.

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
index 19b0eba..bb6af00 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
@@ -43,6 +43,10 @@ static inline void generic_apic_probe(void)
 }
 #endif

+#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
+extern struct irq_chip msi_chip;
+#endif
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC
[...]
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
+void xen_nop_msi_mask(struct irq_data *data)
 {
-       return 0;
 }
 #endif

@@ -424,8 +423,8 @@ int __init pci_xen_init(void)
        x86_msi.setup_msi_irqs = xen_setup_msi_irqs;
        x86_msi.teardown_msi_irq = xen_teardown_msi_irq;
        x86_msi.teardown_msi_irqs = xen_teardown_msi_irqs;
-       x86_msi.msi_mask_irq = xen_nop_msi_mask_irq;
-       x86_msi.msix_mask_irq = xen_nop_msix_mask_irq;
+       msi_chip.irq_mask = xen_nop_msi_mask;
+       msi_chip.irq_unmask = xen_nop_msi_mask;
 #endif
        return 0;
 }
@@ -505,8 +504,8 @@ int __init pci_xen_initial_domain(void)
        x86_msi.setup_msi_irqs = xen_initdom_setup_msi_irqs;
        x86_msi.teardown_msi_irq = xen_teardown_msi_irq;
        x86_msi.restore_msi_irqs = xen_initdom_restore_msi_irqs;
-       x86_msi.msi_mask_irq = xen_nop_msi_mask_irq;
-       x86_msi.msix_mask_irq = xen_nop_msix_mask_irq;
+       msi_chip.irq_mask = xen_nop_msi_mask;
+       msi_chip.irq_unmask = xen_nop_msi_mask;
 #endif
        xen_setup_acpi_sci();


> 
> David
> 
> .
> 


-- 
Thanks!
Yijing

  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-12 11:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-12  7:25 [RFC PATCH 00/20] Use msi_chip to configure MSI/MSI-X in all platforms Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  7:25 ` [RFC PATCH 01/20] x86/xen/MSI: Eliminate arch_msix_mask_irq() and arch_msi_mask_irq() Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  9:09   ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2014-08-12 11:11     ` Yijing Wang [this message]
2014-08-12  7:25 ` [RFC PATCH 02/20] MSI: Clean up struct msi_chip argument Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  7:25 ` [RFC PATCH 03/20] PCI/MSI: Remove useless bus->msi assignment Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  7:25 ` [RFC PATCH 04/20] MSI: Remove the redundant irq_set_chip_data() Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  7:25 ` [RFC PATCH 05/20] MSI: Refactor struct msi_chip to become more common Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  7:25 ` [RFC PATCH 06/20] PCI/MSI: Introduce arch_get_match_msi_chip() to find the match msi_chip Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 07/20] x86/MSI: Use msi_chip instead of arch func to configure MSI/MSI-X Yijing Wang
2014-08-12 19:09   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-08-13  1:16     ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 08/20] x86/xen/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 09/20] irq_remapping/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 10/20] x86/MSI: Remove unused MSI weak arch functions Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 11/20] MIPS/Octeon/MSI: Use msi_chip instead of arch func to configure MSI/MSI-X Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 12/20] MIPS/Xlp/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 13/20] MIPS/xlr/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 14/20] Powerpc/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 15/20] s390/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 16/20] arm/iop13xx/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 17/20] IA64/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 18/20] Sparc/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 19/20] tile/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 20/20] PCI/MSI: Clean up unused MSI arch functions Yijing Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53E9F679.8060302@huawei.com \
    --to=wangyijing@huawei.com \
    --cc=arnab.basu@freescale.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=cmetcalf@tilera.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=huxinwei@huawei.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=wuyun.wu@huawei.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).