From: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
To: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Bharat.Bhushan@freescale.com,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
x86@kernel.org, Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, arnab.basu@freescale.com,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Xinwei Hu <huxinwei@huawei.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Wuyun <wuyun.wu@huawei.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 03/21] MSI: Remove the redundant irq_set_chip_data()
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 09:30:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <541792C0.9090303@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1410789648.3314.5.camel@pengutronix.de>
On 2014/9/15 22:00, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 05.09.2014, 18:09 +0800 schrieb Yijing Wang:
>> Currently, pcie-designware, pcie-rcar, pci-tegra drivers
>> use irq chip_data to save the msi_chip pointer. They
>> already call irq_set_chip_data() in their own MSI irq map
>> functions. So irq_set_chip_data() in arch_setup_msi_irq()
>> is useless.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/pci/msi.c | 2 --
>> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c
>> index f6cb317..d547f7f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
>> @@ -41,8 +41,6 @@ int __weak arch_setup_msi_irq(struct pci_dev *dev, struct msi_desc *desc)
>> if (err < 0)
>> return err;
>>
>> - irq_set_chip_data(desc->irq, chip);
>> -
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>
> arch_teardown_msi_irq() expects to find the msi_chip in the irq
> chip_data field. As this means drivers don't have any reasonable other
> possibility to stuff things into this field, I think it would make sense
> to do the cleanup the other way around: keep the irq_set_chip_data
> arch_setup_msi_irq() and rip it out of the individual drivers.
Hi Lucas, thanks for your review and comments!
irq_set_chip_data() should not be placed in MSI core functions, because other arch like x86,
use irq_data->chip_data to stores irq_cfg. So how to set the chip_data is arch dependent.
And this series is mainly to use MSI chip framework in all platforms.
Currently, only ARM platform MSI drivers use the chip_data to store msi_chip, and the drivers call
irq_set_chip_data() in their driver already. So I thought we should clean up it in MSI core code.
Thanks!
Yijing.
>
> Regards,
> Lucas
>
--
Thanks!
Yijing
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-16 1:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-05 10:09 [PATCH v1 00/21] Use MSI chip to configure MSI/MSI-X in all platforms Yijing Wang
2014-09-05 10:09 ` [PATCH v1 01/21] PCI/MSI: Clean up struct msi_chip argument Yijing Wang
2014-09-05 10:09 ` [PATCH v1 02/21] PCI/MSI: Remove useless bus->msi assignment Yijing Wang
2014-09-05 10:09 ` [PATCH v1 03/21] MSI: Remove the redundant irq_set_chip_data() Yijing Wang
2014-09-15 14:00 ` Lucas Stach
2014-09-16 1:30 ` Yijing Wang [this message]
2014-09-16 10:29 ` Lucas Stach
2014-09-16 10:37 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-05 10:09 ` [PATCH v1 04/21] x86/xen/MSI: Eliminate arch_msix_mask_irq() and arch_msi_mask_irq() Yijing Wang
2014-09-10 12:36 ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2014-09-11 1:22 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-11 13:08 ` David Vrabel
2014-09-05 10:09 ` [PATCH v1 05/21] PCI/MSI: Introduce weak arch_find_msi_chip() to find MSI chip Yijing Wang
2014-09-15 14:42 ` Lucas Stach
2014-09-16 2:08 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-05 10:09 ` [PATCH v1 06/21] PCI/MSI: Refactor struct msi_chip to make it become more common Yijing Wang
2014-09-15 14:44 ` Lucas Stach
2014-09-16 2:09 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-05 10:09 ` [PATCH v1 07/21] x86/MSI: Use MSI chip framework to configure MSI/MSI-X irq Yijing Wang
2014-09-05 10:09 ` [PATCH v1 08/21] x86/xen/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-09-05 14:29 ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2014-09-09 2:06 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-10 12:38 ` David Vrabel
2014-09-10 14:59 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-09-11 1:28 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-11 1:27 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-05 10:09 ` [PATCH v1 09/21] Irq_remapping/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-09-05 10:42 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-09-05 11:30 ` wangyijing
2014-09-05 10:09 ` [PATCH v1 10/21] x86/MSI: Remove unused MSI weak arch functions Yijing Wang
2014-09-05 10:09 ` [PATCH v1 11/21] MIPS/Octeon/MSI: Use MSI chip framework to configure MSI/MSI-X irq Yijing Wang
2014-09-05 10:09 ` [PATCH v1 12/21] MIPS/Xlp: Remove the dead function destroy_irq() to fix build error Yijing Wang
2014-09-05 10:09 ` [PATCH v1 13/21] MIPS/Xlp/MSI: Use MSI chip framework to configure MSI/MSI-X irq Yijing Wang
2014-09-05 10:09 ` [PATCH v1 14/21] MIPS/Xlr/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-09-05 10:10 ` [PATCH v1 15/21] Powerpc/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-09-05 10:47 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-09-05 11:33 ` wangyijing
2014-09-05 11:41 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-09-16 5:28 ` Michael Ellerman
2014-09-16 5:40 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-05 10:10 ` [PATCH v1 16/21] s390/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-09-16 11:35 ` Sebastian Ott
2014-09-17 1:24 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-05 10:10 ` [PATCH v1 17/21] arm/iop13xx/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-09-05 10:10 ` [PATCH v1 18/21] IA64/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-09-05 10:10 ` [PATCH v1 19/21] Sparc/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-09-05 10:10 ` [PATCH v1 20/21] tile/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-09-05 10:10 ` [PATCH v1 21/21] PCI/MSI: Clean up unused MSI arch functions Yijing Wang
2014-09-15 14:47 ` Lucas Stach
2014-09-16 2:09 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-23 21:09 ` [PATCH v1 00/21] Use MSI chip to configure MSI/MSI-X in all platforms Bjorn Helgaas
2014-09-24 3:52 ` Yijing Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=541792C0.9090303@huawei.com \
--to=wangyijing@huawei.com \
--cc=Bharat.Bhushan@freescale.com \
--cc=arnab.basu@freescale.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=cmetcalf@tilera.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=huxinwei@huawei.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=wuyun.wu@huawei.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).