From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com (unknown [119.145.14.65]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FEE61A17FC for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 20:13:52 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <5429308A.7030201@huawei.com> Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 18:12:26 +0800 From: Yijing Wang MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Liviu Dudau Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/22] Use MSI chip framework to configure MSI/MSI-X in all platforms References: <1411614872-4009-1-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com> <20140925074235.GN12423@ulmo> <20140925144855.GB31157@bart.dudau.co.uk> <20140925164937.GB30382@ulmo> <5424E09F.50701@huawei.com> <20140926085030.GE31157@bart.dudau.co.uk> <54276F6C.5010705@huawei.com> <20140928112144.GA4671@bart.dudau.co.uk> <5428B971.50101@huawei.com> <20140929092600.GA15854@bart.dudau.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20140929092600.GA15854@bart.dudau.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Bharat.Bhushan@freescale.com, Thierry Reding , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Russell King , Joerg Roedel , x86@kernel.org, Sebastian Ott , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, arnab.basu@freescale.com, Arnd Bergmann , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Chris Metcalf , Bjorn Helgaas , Thomas Gleixner , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Thomas Petazzoni , Xinwei Hu , Tony Luck , Sergei Shtylyov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ralf Baechle , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, David Vrabel , Wuyun , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "David S. Miller" , Lucas Stach List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , >>> Not necessarily. What I have in mind is something like this: >> >> This is a good idea, what I'm worried is this series is already large, so I think we need to post >> another series to do it. > > I wasn't asking to do it here, I was just offering a suggestion (and sharing some experience) when > it comes to handling msi chip in an arch independent way. It's a good suggestion, thanks! :) > >> >>