* [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/msi: Fix the msi bitmap alignment tests @ 2014-10-10 8:04 Michael Ellerman 2014-10-10 8:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/msi: Use WARN_ON() in msi bitmap selftests Michael Ellerman 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Michael Ellerman @ 2014-10-10 8:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linuxppc-dev When we added the alignment tests recently we failed to check they were actually passing - oops. They weren't passing, because the bitmap was full. We should also be a bit more careful when checking the return code, a negative error return could by divisible by our alignment value. Fixes: b0345bbc6d09 ("powerpc/msi: Improve IRQ bitmap allocator") Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> --- arch/powerpc/sysdev/msi_bitmap.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/msi_bitmap.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/msi_bitmap.c index 0c75214b6f92..8155d93dee1d 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/msi_bitmap.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/msi_bitmap.c @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ void msi_bitmap_free(struct msi_bitmap *bmp) static void __init test_basics(void) { struct msi_bitmap bmp; - int i, size = 512; + int rc, i, size = 512; /* Can't allocate a bitmap of 0 irqs */ check(msi_bitmap_alloc(&bmp, 0, NULL) != 0); @@ -185,14 +185,24 @@ static void __init test_basics(void) msi_bitmap_free_hwirqs(&bmp, size / 2, 1); check(msi_bitmap_alloc_hwirqs(&bmp, 1) == size / 2); + /* Free most of them for the alignment tests */ + msi_bitmap_free_hwirqs(&bmp, 3, size - 3); + /* Check we get a naturally aligned offset */ - check(msi_bitmap_alloc_hwirqs(&bmp, 2) % 2 == 0); - check(msi_bitmap_alloc_hwirqs(&bmp, 4) % 4 == 0); - check(msi_bitmap_alloc_hwirqs(&bmp, 8) % 8 == 0); - check(msi_bitmap_alloc_hwirqs(&bmp, 9) % 16 == 0); - check(msi_bitmap_alloc_hwirqs(&bmp, 3) % 4 == 0); - check(msi_bitmap_alloc_hwirqs(&bmp, 7) % 8 == 0); - check(msi_bitmap_alloc_hwirqs(&bmp, 121) % 128 == 0); + rc = msi_bitmap_alloc_hwirqs(&bmp, 2); + check(rc >= 0 && rc % 2 == 0); + rc = msi_bitmap_alloc_hwirqs(&bmp, 4); + check(rc >= 0 && rc % 4 == 0); + rc = msi_bitmap_alloc_hwirqs(&bmp, 8); + check(rc >= 0 && rc % 8 == 0); + rc = msi_bitmap_alloc_hwirqs(&bmp, 9); + check(rc >= 0 && rc % 16 == 0); + rc = msi_bitmap_alloc_hwirqs(&bmp, 3); + check(rc >= 0 && rc % 4 == 0); + rc = msi_bitmap_alloc_hwirqs(&bmp, 7); + check(rc >= 0 && rc % 8 == 0); + rc = msi_bitmap_alloc_hwirqs(&bmp, 121); + check(rc >= 0 && rc % 128 == 0); msi_bitmap_free(&bmp); -- 1.9.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/msi: Use WARN_ON() in msi bitmap selftests 2014-10-10 8:04 [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/msi: Fix the msi bitmap alignment tests Michael Ellerman @ 2014-10-10 8:04 ` Michael Ellerman 2014-10-10 8:11 ` Laurentiu Tudor 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Michael Ellerman @ 2014-10-10 8:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linuxppc-dev As demonstrated in the previous commit, the failure message from the msi bitmap selftests is a bit subtle, it's easy to miss a failure in a busy boot log. So drop our check() macro and use WARN_ON() instead. This necessitates inverting all the conditions as well. Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> --- arch/powerpc/sysdev/msi_bitmap.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++---------------------- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/msi_bitmap.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/msi_bitmap.c index 8155d93dee1d..73b64c73505b 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/msi_bitmap.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/msi_bitmap.c @@ -145,69 +145,64 @@ void msi_bitmap_free(struct msi_bitmap *bmp) #ifdef CONFIG_MSI_BITMAP_SELFTEST -#define check(x) \ - if (!(x)) printk("msi_bitmap: test failed at line %d\n", __LINE__); - static void __init test_basics(void) { struct msi_bitmap bmp; int rc, i, size = 512; /* Can't allocate a bitmap of 0 irqs */ - check(msi_bitmap_alloc(&bmp, 0, NULL) != 0); + WARN_ON(msi_bitmap_alloc(&bmp, 0, NULL) == 0); /* of_node may be NULL */ - check(0 == msi_bitmap_alloc(&bmp, size, NULL)); + WARN_ON(msi_bitmap_alloc(&bmp, size, NULL)); /* Should all be free by default */ - check(0 == bitmap_find_free_region(bmp.bitmap, size, - get_count_order(size))); + WARN_ON(bitmap_find_free_region(bmp.bitmap, size, get_count_order(size))); bitmap_release_region(bmp.bitmap, 0, get_count_order(size)); /* With no node, there's no msi-available-ranges, so expect > 0 */ - check(msi_bitmap_reserve_dt_hwirqs(&bmp) > 0); + WARN_ON(msi_bitmap_reserve_dt_hwirqs(&bmp) <= 0); /* Should all still be free */ - check(0 == bitmap_find_free_region(bmp.bitmap, size, - get_count_order(size))); + WARN_ON(bitmap_find_free_region(bmp.bitmap, size, get_count_order(size))); bitmap_release_region(bmp.bitmap, 0, get_count_order(size)); /* Check we can fill it up and then no more */ for (i = 0; i < size; i++) - check(msi_bitmap_alloc_hwirqs(&bmp, 1) >= 0); + WARN_ON(msi_bitmap_alloc_hwirqs(&bmp, 1) < 0); - check(msi_bitmap_alloc_hwirqs(&bmp, 1) < 0); + WARN_ON(msi_bitmap_alloc_hwirqs(&bmp, 1) >= 0); /* Should all be allocated */ - check(bitmap_find_free_region(bmp.bitmap, size, 0) < 0); + WARN_ON(bitmap_find_free_region(bmp.bitmap, size, 0) >= 0); /* And if we free one we can then allocate another */ msi_bitmap_free_hwirqs(&bmp, size / 2, 1); - check(msi_bitmap_alloc_hwirqs(&bmp, 1) == size / 2); + WARN_ON(msi_bitmap_alloc_hwirqs(&bmp, 1) != size / 2); /* Free most of them for the alignment tests */ msi_bitmap_free_hwirqs(&bmp, 3, size - 3); /* Check we get a naturally aligned offset */ rc = msi_bitmap_alloc_hwirqs(&bmp, 2); - check(rc >= 0 && rc % 2 == 0); + WARN_ON(rc < 0 && rc % 2 != 0); rc = msi_bitmap_alloc_hwirqs(&bmp, 4); - check(rc >= 0 && rc % 4 == 0); + WARN_ON(rc < 0 && rc % 4 != 0); rc = msi_bitmap_alloc_hwirqs(&bmp, 8); - check(rc >= 0 && rc % 8 == 0); + WARN_ON(rc < 0 && rc % 8 != 0); rc = msi_bitmap_alloc_hwirqs(&bmp, 9); - check(rc >= 0 && rc % 16 == 0); + WARN_ON(rc < 0 && rc % 16 != 0); rc = msi_bitmap_alloc_hwirqs(&bmp, 3); - check(rc >= 0 && rc % 4 == 0); + WARN_ON(rc < 0 && rc % 4 != 0); rc = msi_bitmap_alloc_hwirqs(&bmp, 7); - check(rc >= 0 && rc % 8 == 0); + WARN_ON(rc < 0 && rc % 8 != 0); rc = msi_bitmap_alloc_hwirqs(&bmp, 121); - check(rc >= 0 && rc % 128 == 0); + WARN_ON(rc < 0 && rc % 128 != 0); msi_bitmap_free(&bmp); - /* Clients may check bitmap == NULL for "not-allocated" */ - check(bmp.bitmap == NULL); + /* Clients may WARN_ON bitmap == NULL for "not-allocated" */ + WARN_ON(bmp.bitmap != NULL); kfree(bmp.bitmap); } @@ -229,14 +224,13 @@ static void __init test_of_node(void) of_node_init(&of_node); of_node.full_name = node_name; - check(0 == msi_bitmap_alloc(&bmp, size, &of_node)); + WARN_ON(msi_bitmap_alloc(&bmp, size, &of_node)); /* No msi-available-ranges, so expect > 0 */ - check(msi_bitmap_reserve_dt_hwirqs(&bmp) > 0); + WARN_ON(msi_bitmap_reserve_dt_hwirqs(&bmp) <= 0); /* Should all still be free */ - check(0 == bitmap_find_free_region(bmp.bitmap, size, - get_count_order(size))); + WARN_ON(bitmap_find_free_region(bmp.bitmap, size, get_count_order(size))); bitmap_release_region(bmp.bitmap, 0, get_count_order(size)); /* Now create a fake msi-available-ranges property */ @@ -250,11 +244,11 @@ static void __init test_of_node(void) of_node.properties = ∝ /* msi-available-ranges, so expect == 0 */ - check(msi_bitmap_reserve_dt_hwirqs(&bmp) == 0); + WARN_ON(msi_bitmap_reserve_dt_hwirqs(&bmp)); /* Check we got the expected result */ - check(0 == bitmap_parselist(expected_str, expected, size)); - check(bitmap_equal(expected, bmp.bitmap, size)); + WARN_ON(bitmap_parselist(expected_str, expected, size)); + WARN_ON(!bitmap_equal(expected, bmp.bitmap, size)); msi_bitmap_free(&bmp); kfree(bmp.bitmap); -- 1.9.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/msi: Use WARN_ON() in msi bitmap selftests 2014-10-10 8:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/msi: Use WARN_ON() in msi bitmap selftests Michael Ellerman @ 2014-10-10 8:11 ` Laurentiu Tudor 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Laurentiu Tudor @ 2014-10-10 8:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linuxppc-dev, mpe Hi Michael, Comment inline. On 10/10/2014 11:04 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote: > As demonstrated in the previous commit, the failure message from the msi > bitmap selftests is a bit subtle, it's easy to miss a failure in a busy > boot log. > > So drop our check() macro and use WARN_ON() instead. This necessitates > inverting all the conditions as well. > > Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> > --- > arch/powerpc/sysdev/msi_bitmap.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++---------------------- [snip] > > /* Free most of them for the alignment tests */ > msi_bitmap_free_hwirqs(&bmp, 3, size - 3); > > /* Check we get a naturally aligned offset */ > rc = msi_bitmap_alloc_hwirqs(&bmp, 2); > - check(rc >= 0 && rc % 2 == 0); > + WARN_ON(rc < 0 && rc % 2 != 0); Here and below, shouldn't these be: WARN_ON(rc < 0 || rc % 2 != 0); ? > rc = msi_bitmap_alloc_hwirqs(&bmp, 4); > - check(rc >= 0 && rc % 4 == 0); > + WARN_ON(rc < 0 && rc % 4 != 0); > rc = msi_bitmap_alloc_hwirqs(&bmp, 8); > - check(rc >= 0 && rc % 8 == 0); > + WARN_ON(rc < 0 && rc % 8 != 0); > rc = msi_bitmap_alloc_hwirqs(&bmp, 9); > - check(rc >= 0 && rc % 16 == 0); > + WARN_ON(rc < 0 && rc % 16 != 0); > rc = msi_bitmap_alloc_hwirqs(&bmp, 3); > - check(rc >= 0 && rc % 4 == 0); > + WARN_ON(rc < 0 && rc % 4 != 0); > rc = msi_bitmap_alloc_hwirqs(&bmp, 7); > - check(rc >= 0 && rc % 8 == 0); > + WARN_ON(rc < 0 && rc % 8 != 0); > rc = msi_bitmap_alloc_hwirqs(&bmp, 121); > - check(rc >= 0 && rc % 128 == 0); > + WARN_ON(rc < 0 && rc % 128 != 0); > > msi_bitmap_free(&bmp); > > - /* Clients may check bitmap == NULL for "not-allocated" */ > - check(bmp.bitmap == NULL); > + /* Clients may WARN_ON bitmap == NULL for "not-allocated" */ > + WARN_ON(bmp.bitmap != NULL); > > kfree(bmp.bitmap); > } > @@ -229,14 +224,13 @@ static void __init test_of_node(void) > of_node_init(&of_node); > of_node.full_name = node_name; > > - check(0 == msi_bitmap_alloc(&bmp, size, &of_node)); > + WARN_ON(msi_bitmap_alloc(&bmp, size, &of_node)); > > /* No msi-available-ranges, so expect > 0 */ > - check(msi_bitmap_reserve_dt_hwirqs(&bmp) > 0); > + WARN_ON(msi_bitmap_reserve_dt_hwirqs(&bmp) <= 0); > > /* Should all still be free */ > - check(0 == bitmap_find_free_region(bmp.bitmap, size, > - get_count_order(size))); > + WARN_ON(bitmap_find_free_region(bmp.bitmap, size, get_count_order(size))); > bitmap_release_region(bmp.bitmap, 0, get_count_order(size)); > > /* Now create a fake msi-available-ranges property */ > @@ -250,11 +244,11 @@ static void __init test_of_node(void) > of_node.properties = ∝ > > /* msi-available-ranges, so expect == 0 */ > - check(msi_bitmap_reserve_dt_hwirqs(&bmp) == 0); > + WARN_ON(msi_bitmap_reserve_dt_hwirqs(&bmp)); > > /* Check we got the expected result */ > - check(0 == bitmap_parselist(expected_str, expected, size)); > - check(bitmap_equal(expected, bmp.bitmap, size)); > + WARN_ON(bitmap_parselist(expected_str, expected, size)); > + WARN_ON(!bitmap_equal(expected, bmp.bitmap, size)); > > msi_bitmap_free(&bmp); > kfree(bmp.bitmap); > --- Best Regards, Laurentiu ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-10-10 8:28 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2014-10-10 8:04 [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/msi: Fix the msi bitmap alignment tests Michael Ellerman 2014-10-10 8:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/msi: Use WARN_ON() in msi bitmap selftests Michael Ellerman 2014-10-10 8:11 ` Laurentiu Tudor
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).