From: "Suresh Chandra Mannava" <coreppcdevel@gmail.com>
To: "Kumar Gala" <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: "linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org list" <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
LinuxPPC-Embedded <linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: removal of arch/ppc in 2.6.27?
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 19:35:14 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <543e3890805160705l10e718f2g6e49d842086ec662@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D713F373-AE2A-4341-9C29-EF65B9399B36@kernel.crashing.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2174 bytes --]
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 9:00 PM, Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
wrote:
> This is intended as a reminder that we plan on getting rid of arch/ppc this
> summer. I'm guessing based on kernel release times that will be 2.6.27. That would mean 2.6.26 will be the last kernel to support arch/ppc.
>
> If people have boards that like ported over please let us know and work
> with us to port this over to arch/powerpc.
>
> Here is a list based on arch/ppc/platforms. Its not intended to be
> complete but a general idea of what's left in arch/ppc.
I am still struggling to make SPRUCE work with 2.6.24 arch/ppc. I think no
body had tested 2.6.x on SPRUCE. I think there is some issue with cpc700 pic
driver.
I feel it is better to move SPRUCE along with other arch/ppc boards to
arch/powerpc
Thanks,
Suresh
>
>
> PPC_PREP e6xx
> PQ2ADS 82xx in arch/powerpc?
> TQM8260 82xx
> CPCI690 e6xx/mv64x60
> EV64260 e6xx/mv64x60
> CHESTNUT e6xx/mv64x60
> LOPEC e6xx
> KATANA e6xx/mv64x60
> HDPU e6xx/mv64x60
> MVME5100 e6xx
> PAL4 e6xx
> POWERPMC250 e6xx
> PPLUS e6xx
> PRPMC750 e6xx
> PRPMC800 e6xx
> RADSTONE_PPC7D e6xx
> SANDPOINT e6xx
> SBC82xx 82xx
> SPRUCE e6xx
> LITE5200 52xx
> EV64360 e6xx/mv64x60
> MPC86XADS 8xx in arch/powerpc
> MPC885ADS 8xx in arch/powerpc
> ADS8272 82xx in arch/powerpc
>
> 4xx:
> BAMBOO 44x in arch/powerpc
> CPCI405 40x
> EBONY 44x in arch/powerpc
> EP405 40x in arch/powerpc
> BUBINGA 40x
> LUAN 44x
> YUCCA 44x
> OCOTEA 44x
> REDWOOD_5 40x
> REDWOOD_6 40x
> SYCAMORE 40x
> TAISHAN 44x in arch/powerpc
> WALNUT 40x in arch/powerpc
> XILINX_ML300 40x
> XILINX_ML403 40x
>
> - k
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3972 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-16 14:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-19 15:30 removal of arch/ppc in 2.6.27? Kumar Gala
2008-04-19 16:27 ` Grant Likely
2008-04-19 18:13 ` Josh Boyer
2008-04-19 20:43 ` Chuck Meade
2008-04-20 0:39 ` Dwayne Fontenot
2008-04-20 11:14 ` Marvin
2008-04-20 12:27 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-04-20 12:55 ` Gabriel Paubert
2008-04-20 13:43 ` Marvin
2008-04-21 8:03 ` David Woodhouse
2008-05-16 14:05 ` Suresh Chandra Mannava [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=543e3890805160705l10e718f2g6e49d842086ec662@mail.gmail.com \
--to=coreppcdevel@gmail.com \
--cc=galak@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).