From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e34.co.us.ibm.com (e34.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.152]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F8971A09D1 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 18:09:19 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from /spool/local by e34.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 00:09:17 -0700 Received: from b03cxnp08025.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp08025.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.17]) by d03dlp02.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A08E3E40030 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 00:09:15 -0700 (MST) Received: from d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (d03av03.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.169]) by b03cxnp08025.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id sAJ79EQ553215276 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 08:09:14 +0100 Received: from d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id sAJ79EdV008619 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 00:09:14 -0700 Message-ID: <546C420B.30307@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 12:38:59 +0530 From: Preeti U Murthy MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Stanley Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuidle/powernv: Re-enable fastsleep at boot time References: <20141118065603.22544.88816.stgit@preeti.in.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Michael Neuling , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi Joel, On 11/19/2014 08:04 AM, Joel Stanley wrote: > Hey Preeti, > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Preeti U Murthy > wrote: >> Commit dcb18694 "Fix ipi on palmeto" disabled fastsleep at boot time. > > I couldn't find this commit in any tree; upstream, mpe's next, nor powerkvm. Oh yes you are right. I must have been looking at the wrong git branch. I verified upstream now. The commit dcb18694 is not present.So we are good. Thanks for pointing this out :) Sorry for the noise! > > I remember testing this as a workaround for the palmetto, but I don't > recall sending it upstream. > > Cheers, > > Joel > Regards Preeti U Murthy