From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e06smtp12.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp12.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5164C1A0344 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 06:54:34 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from /spool/local by e06smtp12.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 19:54:30 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay10.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.195]) by d06dlp01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B41517D8043 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 19:54:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av10.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av10.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.251]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id sB9JsSci54067390 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 19:54:28 GMT Received: from d06av10.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d06av10.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id sB9JsRYG011563 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 12:54:28 -0700 Message-ID: <54875373.50305@de.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 20:54:27 +0100 From: Christian Borntraeger MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Rothwell , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Michael Ellerman Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the access_once tree References: <20141208222641.40a64946@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20141208222641.40a64946@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Am 08.12.2014 um 12:26 schrieb Stephen Rothwell: > Hi Christian, > > After merging the acess_once tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > allnoconfig) failed like this: > > arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c: In function 'find_linux_pte_or_hugepte': > arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c:981:3: error: invalid initializer > pud = ACCESS_ONCE(*pudp); > ^ > arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c:993:4: error: invalid initializer > pmd = ACCESS_ONCE(*pmdp); > ^ > > These are preexisting ... > > mm/gup.c: In function 'gup_pmd_range': > mm/gup.c:929:3: error: invalid initializer > pmd_t pmd = ACCESS_ONCE(*pmdp); > ^ > mm/gup.c:929:3: error: (near initialization for 'pmd') > > This is from commit f30c59e921f1 ("mm: Update generic gup > implementation to handle hugepage directory") from the powerpc-mpe (and > powerpc) tree and so will require a merge fix patch (presumable > s/ACCESS_ONCE/READ_ONCE/). > > I am not sure how many architectures you are trying to cover, but > powerpc is one I care about :-) > > I have dropped the access_once tree again today, sorry (its too late at > night). > Next try. I removed the change of ACCESS_ONCE and just left the new interfaces and the simple reworks in the queue. I will tackle everything else after rc1 when next should be small again. Keeping fingers crossed.... Christian