linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Purcareata Bogdan <b43198@freescale.com>
To: <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC] PPC: MPIC: necessary readback after EOI?
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 16:14:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54AA9C4D.3000001@freescale.com> (raw)

Hello,

While doing some performance testing of a KVM guest on a PPC platform, I 
noticed that there's a read of the CPU_WHOAMI register after each MPIC 
EOI [1]. This has been present since the initial implementation of the 
MPIC driver [2]. In a KVM virtualized environment, this results in an 
additional kvm_exit.

Is the read back necessary? Is it used to provide some sort of 
synchronization mechanism, making sure that nothing else is executed 
until the EOI write is finished? I eliminated the mpic_cpu_read call and 
run the kernel on hardware and noticed no anomaly, however I am not sure 
of all the implications and race conditions it might lead to.

I was curious why the mpic_cpu_read(MPIC_INFO(CPU_WHOAMI)) was there in 
the first place and if it's still needed. If it's still required, I 
guess a better approach is to eliminate the call only if the kernel is 
running on the KVM guest side, where the MPIC is emulated and no longer 
requires a readback.

Thank you,
Bogdan P.

[1] http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c#L659
[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2004/10/22/483

             reply	other threads:[~2015-01-05 16:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-05 14:14 Purcareata Bogdan [this message]
2015-01-05 17:46 ` [RFC] PPC: MPIC: necessary readback after EOI? Andreas Mohr
2015-01-05 18:10   ` Scott Wood
2015-01-05 18:43     ` Andreas Mohr
2015-01-07  2:56       ` Scott Wood
2015-01-07 14:44     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-01-07 17:04       ` Scott Wood
2015-01-08 19:17         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-01-07 14:43   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-01-07 14:40 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-01-08  0:49   ` Segher Boessenkool

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54AA9C4D.3000001@freescale.com \
    --to=b43198@freescale.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).