From: Purcareata Bogdan <b43198@freescale.com>
To: <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC] PPC: MPIC: necessary readback after EOI?
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 16:14:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54AA9C4D.3000001@freescale.com> (raw)
Hello,
While doing some performance testing of a KVM guest on a PPC platform, I
noticed that there's a read of the CPU_WHOAMI register after each MPIC
EOI [1]. This has been present since the initial implementation of the
MPIC driver [2]. In a KVM virtualized environment, this results in an
additional kvm_exit.
Is the read back necessary? Is it used to provide some sort of
synchronization mechanism, making sure that nothing else is executed
until the EOI write is finished? I eliminated the mpic_cpu_read call and
run the kernel on hardware and noticed no anomaly, however I am not sure
of all the implications and race conditions it might lead to.
I was curious why the mpic_cpu_read(MPIC_INFO(CPU_WHOAMI)) was there in
the first place and if it's still needed. If it's still required, I
guess a better approach is to eliminate the call only if the kernel is
running on the KVM guest side, where the MPIC is emulated and no longer
requires a readback.
Thank you,
Bogdan P.
[1] http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c#L659
[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2004/10/22/483
next reply other threads:[~2015-01-05 16:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-05 14:14 Purcareata Bogdan [this message]
2015-01-05 17:46 ` [RFC] PPC: MPIC: necessary readback after EOI? Andreas Mohr
2015-01-05 18:10 ` Scott Wood
2015-01-05 18:43 ` Andreas Mohr
2015-01-07 2:56 ` Scott Wood
2015-01-07 14:44 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-01-07 17:04 ` Scott Wood
2015-01-08 19:17 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-01-07 14:43 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-01-07 14:40 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-01-08 0:49 ` Segher Boessenkool
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54AA9C4D.3000001@freescale.com \
--to=b43198@freescale.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).