linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>,
	Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 02/11] i2c: add quirk checks to core
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 22:35:27 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54B02D7F.7040501@cogentembedded.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1420824103-24169-3-git-send-email-wsa@the-dreams.de>

Hello.

On 01/09/2015 08:21 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:

> Let the core do the checks if HW quirks prevent a transfer. Saves code
> from drivers and adds consistency.

> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
> ---
>   drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> index 39d25a8cb1ad..7b10a19abf5b 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> @@ -2063,6 +2063,56 @@ module_exit(i2c_exit);
>    * ----------------------------------------------------
>    */
>
> +/* Check if val is exceeding the quirk IFF quirk is non 0 */
> +#define i2c_quirk_exceeded(val, quirk) ((quirk) && ((val) > (quirk)))
> +
> +static int i2c_quirk_error(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg *msg, char *err_msg)
> +{
> +	dev_err(&adap->dev, "quirk: %s (addr 0x%04x, size %u)\n", err_msg, msg->addr, msg->len);
> +	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +}

    Always returning the same value doesn't make much sense. Are you trying to 
save space on the call sites?

[...]
> @@ -2080,6 +2130,9 @@ int __i2c_transfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg *msgs, int num)
>   	unsigned long orig_jiffies;
>   	int ret, try;
>
> +	if (adap->quirks && i2c_check_for_quirks(adap, msgs, num))

    So, you only check for non-zero result of this function? Perhaps it makes 
sense to return true/false instead?

> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +

WBR, Sergei

  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-09 19:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-09 17:21 [RFC 00/11] i2c: add generic quirk infrastructure Wolfram Sang
2015-01-09 17:21 ` [RFC 01/11] i2c: add quirk structure to describe adapter flaws Wolfram Sang
2015-01-16  5:50   ` Eddie Huang
2015-01-19 15:05     ` Wolfram Sang
2015-02-24 16:04       ` Wolfram Sang
2015-01-16  8:18   ` Yingjoe Chen
2015-01-19 15:00     ` Wolfram Sang
2015-01-09 17:21 ` [RFC 02/11] i2c: add quirk checks to core Wolfram Sang
2015-01-09 19:35   ` Sergei Shtylyov [this message]
2015-01-09 20:45     ` Wolfram Sang
2015-01-09 21:05       ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-01-12  9:58   ` Ludovic Desroches
2015-01-12 10:13     ` Wolfram Sang
2015-01-12 12:08   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-24 14:25     ` Wolfram Sang
2015-01-12 13:15   ` Matthias Brugger
2015-02-24 14:16     ` Wolfram Sang
2015-01-09 17:21 ` [RFC 03/11] i2c: at91: make use of the new infrastructure for quirks Wolfram Sang
2015-01-09 17:21 ` [RFC 04/11] i2c: opal: " Wolfram Sang
2015-01-09 17:21 ` [RFC 05/11] i2c: qup: " Wolfram Sang
2015-01-09 17:21 ` [RFC 06/11] i2c: cpm: " Wolfram Sang
2015-01-09 17:21 ` [RFC 07/11] i2c: axxia: " Wolfram Sang
2015-01-09 17:21 ` [RFC 08/11] i2c: dln2: " Wolfram Sang
2015-01-09 17:21 ` [RFC 09/11] i2c: powermac: " Wolfram Sang
2015-01-09 17:21 ` [RFC 10/11] i2c: viperboard: " Wolfram Sang
2015-01-09 17:21 ` [RFC 11/11] i2c: pmcmsp: " Wolfram Sang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54B02D7F.7040501@cogentembedded.com \
    --to=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=ludovic.desroches@atmel.com \
    --cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    --cc=yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).