From: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com
Cc: stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] cpuidle/powernv: Read target_residency value of idle states from DT if available
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 14:25:47 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54CF3B93.9090507@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1422859164.20278.1.camel@ellerman.id.au>
On 02/02/2015 12:09 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 10:40 +0530, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
>> The device tree now exposes the residency values for different idle states. Read
>> these values instead of calculating residency from the latency values. The values
>> exposed in the DT are validated for optimal power efficiency. However to maintain
>> compatibility with the older firmware code which does not expose residency
>> values, use default values as a fallback mechanism. While at it, use better
>> APIs to parse the powermgmt device tree node so as to avoid endianness
>> transformation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> Changes from V2: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/27/1054
>> 1. Used APIs to eliminate endianness transformation
>
> Hi Preeti,
>
> I thought I was pretty clear when I said you should do that as a follow-up
> patch.
>
> This is now doing too many things, it's not a single logical change, and it's
> touching code in arch/powerpc and the driver. Which means neither I nor Rafael
> can easily merge it.
>
> So please go back to the v2 you had. And then do the of_property_count_u32_elems()
> changes as separate patches.
Yeah I apologize for this; going back to the conversation we had, I
realize that I completely overlooked the part where you suggested it as
a second patch. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Rafael, please ignore the versions sent so far. I shall send out two
patches that are logically separated. V2 of this patch that you were
requested to pick up needs some more fixes; the patch was not freeing
the dynamically allocated data after populating the cpufreq table. Ill
fix all of these in the next posting.
Thanks
Regards
Preeti U Murthy
>
> cheers
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-02 8:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-02 5:10 [PATCH V3] cpuidle/powernv: Read target_residency value of idle states from DT if available Preeti U Murthy
2015-02-02 6:09 ` Stewart Smith
2015-02-02 6:39 ` Michael Ellerman
2015-02-02 8:55 ` Preeti U Murthy [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54CF3B93.9090507@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).