linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
	Bogdan Purcareata <bogdan.purcareata@freescale.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: scottwood@freescale.com, mihai.caraman@freescale.com,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] powerpc/kvm: Enable running guests on RT Linux
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 15:57:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54E74B58.90706@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54E74A8C.30802@linutronix.de>



On 20/02/2015 15:54, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Usually you see "scheduling while atomic" on -RT and convert them to
> raw locks if it is appropriate.
> 
> Bogdan wrote in 2/2 that he needs to limit the number of CPUs in oder
> not cause a DoS and large latencies in the host. I haven't seen an
> answer to my why question. Because if the conversation leads to
> large latencies in the host then it does not look right.
> 
> Each host PIC has a rawlock and does mostly just mask/unmask and the
> raw lock makes sure the value written is not mixed up due to
> preemption.
> This hardly increase latencies because the "locked" path is very short.
> If this conversation leads to higher latencies then the locked path is
> too long and hardly suitable to become a rawlock.

Yes, but large latencies just mean the code has to be rewritten (x86
doesn't anymore do event injection in an atomic regions for example).
Until it is, using raw_spin_lock is correct.

Paolo

  reply	other threads:[~2015-02-20 14:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-18  9:32 [PATCH 0/2] powerpc/kvm: Enable running guests on RT Linux Bogdan Purcareata
2015-02-18  9:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/kvm: Convert openpic lock to raw_spinlock Bogdan Purcareata
2015-02-23 22:43   ` Scott Wood
2015-02-18  9:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/kvm: Limit MAX_VCPUS for guests running on RT Linux Bogdan Purcareata
2015-02-18  9:36   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-02-20 13:45   ` Alexander Graf
2015-02-23 22:48     ` Scott Wood
2015-02-20 13:45 ` [PATCH 0/2] powerpc/kvm: Enable running guests " Alexander Graf
2015-02-20 14:12   ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-20 14:16     ` Alexander Graf
2015-02-20 14:54     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-02-20 14:57       ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2015-02-20 15:06         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-02-20 15:10           ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-20 15:17             ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-02-23  8:12               ` Purcareata Bogdan
2015-02-23  7:50           ` Purcareata Bogdan
2015-02-23  7:29       ` Purcareata Bogdan
2015-02-23 23:27       ` Scott Wood
2015-02-25 16:36         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-02-26 13:02         ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-26 13:31           ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-02-27  1:05             ` Scott Wood
2015-02-27 13:06               ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-03-27 17:07               ` Purcareata Bogdan
2015-04-02 23:11                 ` Scott Wood
2015-04-03  8:07                   ` Purcareata Bogdan
2015-04-03 21:26                     ` Scott Wood
2015-04-09  7:44                       ` Purcareata Bogdan
2015-04-09 23:53                         ` Scott Wood
2015-04-20 10:53                           ` Purcareata Bogdan
2015-04-21  0:52                             ` Scott Wood
2015-04-22 12:06                               ` Purcareata Bogdan
2015-04-23  0:30                                 ` Scott Wood
2015-04-23 12:31                                   ` Purcareata Bogdan
2015-04-23 21:26                                     ` Scott Wood
2015-04-27  6:45                                       ` Purcareata Bogdan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54E74B58.90706@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bogdan.purcareata@freescale.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mihai.caraman@freescale.com \
    --cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).